Cited by 80Wound Healing and TreatmentsInflammation biomarkers and pathwaysLiver physiology and pathology

Cytokine gene expression in a murine wound healing model

Bryan, Donna, Walker, Kenneth B., Ferguson, Mark, Thorpe, Robin·2005·Cytokine

Abstract

Inflammatory mediators have been shown to play a major role in the complex series of co-ordinated events that occur in wound healing responses following injury. However, to date most of the studies carried out have addressed the expression, interactions and role of only one or two cytokines that are thought to be involved in wound repair. This study has evaluated, in murine skin samples taken at 0, 3, 12, 18, 24, 48, 72, 120 and 168 h post-wounding, the expression of a wide range of cytokines with potential for a role in wound repair. Various techniques (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), bioassays and ELISA) were used to evaluate cytokine expression in these samples at both the mRNA and protein expressions level. Semi-quantitative analysis using RT-PCR revealed that IL-1beta, IP10, bFGF, and TGFbeta3 up-regulated in wounded samples, compared to non-injured control samples. Expression of mRNA for other cytokines and inflammatory mediators, IL-1alpha, IL-6, TGFbeta1, TNFalpha, MIP-1alpha, MIP-2, JE, KC, PDGFalpha and PDGFbeta, were found to be down-regulated in injured adult murine samples compared to normal control samples. Interestingly we failed to find evidence of mRNA expression for the cytokines IL-2, IL-4, IL-12, GM-CSF, IFNgamma and RANTES, in both non-injured and injured samples. These observations were also generally supported by the results obtained using bioassays for IL-1 and IL-6 and ELISA for IL-1alpha, IL-1beta, IL-6, TNFalpha, and IFNgamma.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cyto.2005.06.015

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In mouse skin wounds, IL-4 mRNA and protein are not detectable at early or late time-points.

    “In mouse skin wounds, IL-4 mRNA and protein are not detectable at early or late time-points [60,71].”

    From Macrophage phenotypes during tissue repair (2013) · cites this paper as [71]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bryan, D., Walker, K. B., Ferguson, M., & Thorpe, R.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Bryan, Donna
Venue
Cytokine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
429-438
ISSN
1043-4666 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999878829
Cited by
80
References
66
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cytokine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Inflammation biomarkers and pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
wound healing, cytokine gene expression, skin damage, mouse model, IL-1β, interleukin-6, TNF-α, TGF-beta3, basic fibroblast growth factor, CXCL10, inflammatory mediators, cytokine mRNA expression
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Assay, Cell Line, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Male, Mice, Inbred Strains, RNA, Messenger, Wound Healing, Gene Expression, Cytokines, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Models, Animal, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review