Cited by 50Wound Healing and TreatmentsChemokine receptors and signalingLiver physiology and pathology

The chemokine receptor CCR1 is strongly up‐regulated after skin injury but dispensable for wound healing

Kaesler, Susanne, Bugnon, Philippe, Gao, Ji‐Liang, Murphy, Philip M., Goppelt, Andreas, Werner, Sabine·2004·Wound Repair and Regeneration

Abstract

To identify key regulators of cutaneous wound repair, we analyzed a subtractive cDNA library of normal and wounded mouse skin. One of the identified genes encodes the chemokine receptor CCR1, which binds several chemokines present at the wound site. Expression of CCR1 was barely detectable in nonwounded skin, but strong up‐regulation was observed after injury to wild‐type mice. Most important, the healing abnormalities observed in glucocorticoid‐treated mice and activin‐overexpressing transgenic mice correlated with an altered expression of CCR1. CCR1‐positive cells were identified as macrophages and neutrophils within the wounded area. To determine the importance of CCR1 for wound repair, we analyzed this process in CCR1 knockout mice. Surprisingly, no alterations in either wound closure, wound appearance, wound bursting strength, granulation tissue formation, or re‐epithelialization were observed. In addition, the inflammatory response was unaltered in CCR1‐deficient mice and the expression of several chemokines, chemokine receptors, and other important regulators of wound repair were normal in these animals. These results show that CCR1 is dispensable for wound healing, most likely due to redundancy in chemokine/chemokine receptor signaling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.012112.x

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CCR1−/− mouse, in which leukocyte recruitment is impaired, shows no change in wound healing in experimental acute wounds.

    “The CCR1−/− mouse, in which leukocyte recruitment is impaired, shows no change in wound healing in experimental acute wounds.51”

    From The Innate Immune System in Acute and Chronic Wounds (2016) · cites this paper as [51]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaesler, S., Bugnon, P., Gao, J., Murphy, P. M., Goppelt, A., & Werner, S.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Werner, Sabine
Venue
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-04
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
193-204
ISSN
  • 1067-1927 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-475X
OpenAlex
W2002191327
Cited by
50
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wound Repair and Regeneration (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
CCR1, chemokine receptors, skin wound healing, skin damage, glucocorticoid therapy, activin, macrophages, neutrophils, wound closure, re-epithelialization, granulation tissue, wound inflammation
MeSH terms
Animals, Carbon Tetrachloride, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, RNA, Messenger, Down-Regulation, Gene Expression, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Oligonucleotides, Antisense, Immediate-Early Proteins, Models, Animal, Collagen Type I, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Mice, Transforming Growth Factor beta1, Connective Tissue Growth Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review