Cited by 88Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and Trauma

Interpersonal violence, PTSD, and inflammation: Potential psychogenic pathways to higher C-reactive protein levels

Open access
Heath, Nicole M., Chesney, Samantha A., Gerhart, James I., Goldsmith, Rachel E., Luborsky, Judith L., Stevens, Natalie R., Hobfoll, Stevan E.·2013·Cytokine

Abstract

Interpersonal violence (IPV) is major public health concern with wide-ranging sequelae including depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and possible alterations of immune and inflammation processes. There is a need to identify the psycho-biological pathways through which IPV may translate to altered inflammatory processes since both PTSD and inflammation are associated with serious physical health conditions such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. This study investigated the relationships between IPV, psychological distress, and the inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP), in a sample of 139 urban women who have a high likelihood for having experienced IPV. Participants were recruited from an outpatient gynecology clinic to complete self-report measures about their IPV histories and psychological symptoms, as well as to have their blood sampled using a finger stick. Results indicated that exposure to IPV predicted the presence of probable depression and PTSD diagnoses. Individuals who experience clinical levels of PTSD exhibited higher CRP levels, and this relationship held after adjusting for comorbid depression. Correlational analyses suggested that reexperiencing symptoms may explain the link between PTSD diagnosis and higher levels of CRP. Follow-up path analytic models provided good fit to the overall data, and indicated that the relationship between probable PTSD status and CRP is not explained by higher BMI. Overall, these findings call for increased attention to the role of PTSD in explaining links between trauma and diminished health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.04.030

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased concentrations of CRP are seen in individuals with PTSD.

    “Increased concentrations of CRP are also seen in individuals with PTSD (Bersani et al, 2016;Heath et al, 2013;Miller et al, 2001;Plantinga et al, 2013).”

    From Inflammation in Fear- and Anxiety-Based Disorders: PTSD, GAD, and Beyond (2017) · cites this paper as Heath et al, 2013

  • At least with PTSD, increased inflammation levels have remained significant after adjusting for BMI in multiple studies.

    “However, at least with PTSD, increased inflammation levels have remained significant after adjusting for BMI in multiple studies (Heath et al, 2013;McCanlies et al, 2011;Spitzer et al, 2010).”

    From Inflammation in Fear- and Anxiety-Based Disorders: PTSD, GAD, and Beyond (2017) · cites this paper as Heath et al, 2013

  • CRP concentration is correlated with PTSD symptom severity and duration, such that PTSD patients with high CRP had greater symptom severity and duration than those with low CRP.

    “Michopoulos et al (2015) and Heath et al (2013) reported that CRP concentration was correlated with PTSD symptom severity and duration, such that PTSD patients with high, compared with low, CRP had greater symptom severity and duration (Heath et al, 2013;Michopoulos et al, 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heath, N. M., Chesney, S. A., Gerhart, J. I., Goldsmith, R. E., Luborsky, J. L., Stevens, N. R., & Hobfoll, S. E.
Affiliations
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Marquette University (US)
Corresponding author
Heath, Nicole M.
Venue
Cytokine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
172-178
ISSN
1043-4666 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094506143
Cited by
88
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cytokine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P50HL105189)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
interpersonal violence, post-traumatic stress disorder, C-reactive protein, inflammation, depression, psychological distress, re-experiencing symptoms, psychoneuroimmunology, urban women, body mass index
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, C-Reactive Protein, Depression, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Violence, Crime Victims, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review