Cited by 109Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Age-related changes in insula cortical thickness and impulsivity: Significance for emotional development and decision-making

Open access
Churchwell, John C., Yurgelun-Todd, Deborah A.·2013·Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Insula function has been associated with emotional regulation, adjusting to changing outcomes under risk, reward and loss anticipation, discounting of future rewards, and self-rated impulsivity. The role of the insula in these processes may be fundamentally related to prospective thinking, a trait that increases with age. There is evidence that insular cortical thickness shows age related decreases that parallel age related increases in future orientation and planning. We tested the hypothesis that nonplanning decreases with age and that insula thickness is related to both age and nonplanning impulsivity. Fifty-nine male and female participants, ranging in age from 10 to 22 years old, underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures and were assessed using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS). We observed that anterior insula thickness and nonplanning impulsivity show an inverse relationship with age and that there is a significant positive linear relationship between anterior insula thickness and nonplanning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dcn.2013.07.001

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 49 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–109 of 109

Metadata

Authors
Churchwell, J. C., & Yurgelun-Todd, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Churchwell, John C.
Venue
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
6
Pages
80-86
ISSN
1878-9293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999016880
Cited by
109
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NIH (1R01 DA020269-01, R03DA029180-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
insula, cortical thickness, impulsivity, aging, emotional development, decision-making, emotion regulation, future orientation, planning, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Aging, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Decision Making, Emotions, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuronal Plasticity, Problem Solving, Thinking, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review