Cited by 278Interdisciplinary Research and CollaborationEthics in Clinical ResearchResearch, Science, and Academia

A description of the ABCD organizational structure and communication framework.

Open access
Auchter, Allison M., Hernandez Mejia, Margie, Heyser, Charles J., Shilling, Paul D., Jernigan, Terry L., Brown, Sandra A., Tapert, Susan F., Dowling, Gayathri J.·2018·Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study is designed to be the largest study of brain development and child health in the United States, performing comprehensive assessments of 11,500 children repeatedly for 10 years. An endeavor of this magnitude requires an organized framework of governance and communication that promotes collaborative decision-making and dissemination of information. The ABCD consortium structure, built upon the Matrix Management approach of organizational theory, facilitates the integration of input from all institutions, numerous internal workgroups and committees, federal partners, and external advisory groups to make use of a broad range of expertise to ensure the study's success.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.003

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Auchter, A. M., Hernandez Mejia, M., Heyser, C. J., Shilling, P. D., Jernigan, T. L., Brown, S. A., Tapert, S. F., & Dowling, G. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
Corresponding author
Tapert, Susan F.
Venue
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
32
Pages
8-15
ISSN
1878-9293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2800017625
Cited by
278
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
35.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
Keywords
Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, organizational structure, communication framework, governance, collaborative decision-making, matrix management, child health, brain development, data dissemination
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain, Cognition, Communication, Humans, Adolescent Development, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review