Cited by 86Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorFace Recognition and PerceptionAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Epigenetic modification of the oxytocin receptor gene is associated with emotion processing in the infant brain

Open access
Krol, Kathleen M., Puglia, Meghan H., Morris, James P., Connelly, Jessica J., Grossmann, Tobias·2019·Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The neural capacity to discriminate between emotions emerges early in development, though little is known about specific factors that contribute to variability in this vital skill during infancy. In adults, DNA methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTRm) is an epigenetic modification that is variable, predictive of gene expression, and has been linked to autism spectrum disorder and the neural response to social cues. It is unknown whether OXTRm is variable in infants, and whether it is predictive of early social function. Implementing a developmental neuroimaging epigenetics approach in a large sample of infants (N = 98), we examined whether OXTRm is associated with neural responses to emotional expressions. OXTRm was assessed at 5 months of age. At 7 months of age, infants viewed happy, angry, and fearful faces while functional near-infrared spectroscopy was recorded. We observed that OXTRm shows considerable variability among infants. Critically, infants with higher OXTRm show enhanced responses to anger and fear and attenuated responses to happiness in right inferior frontal cortex, a region implicated in emotion processing through action-perception coupling. Findings support models emphasizing oxytocin's role in modulating neural response to emotion and identify OXTRm as an epigenetic mark contributing to early brain function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100648

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-quality rearing lowers OXTR and NR3C1 methylation.

    “studies demonstrate that having a high-quality rearing lowers OXTR and NR3C1 methylation”

    From The clinical use of epigenetics in psychiatry: a narrative review of epigenetic mechanisms, key candidate genes, and precision psychiatry (2025) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Results report that maternal personal distress correlates positively with infant OXTR methylation, but personal distress is not a measure of rearing quality. The Discussion says maternal behavior’s effect on OXTR methylation needs direct study and cautions against causal conclusions. A search for NR3C1 found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krol, K. M., Puglia, M. H., Morris, J. P., Connelly, J. J., & Grossmann, T.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Krol, Kathleen M.
Venue
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
37
Pages
100648
ISSN
1878-9293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2941947643
Cited by
86
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3
FWCI
16.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Max Planck Society
  • University of Virginia
  • International Max Planck Research School
  • NIH NRSA T32 Research Training in Neuroendocrinology Fellowship
  • Hartwell Biomedical Research Fellowship
  • National Science Foundation (1228522, 1729289)
  • Examining an Epigenetic Biomarker of Social Perception
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
oxytocin receptor gene, DNA methylation, epigenetics, emotional processing, infant brain, facial expression perception, inferior frontal cortex, perception-action coupling, social development (developmental psychology), developmental neuroimaging
MeSH terms
Brain, Emotions, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Receptors, Oxytocin, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review