Cited by 122Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesFace Recognition and Perception

Oxytocin and the social brain: Neural mechanisms and perspectives in human research

Kanat, Manuela, Heinrichs, Markus, Domes, Gregor·2014·Brain Research

Abstract

The present paper summarizes functional imaging studies investigating the effects of intranasal oxytocin (OT) on brain responses to social stimuli. We aim to integrate previous research, point to unresolved issues and highlight perspectives for future studies. The studies so far have focused on identifying neural circuits underlying social information processing which are particularly sensitive to modulations by exogenous OT. Most consistently, stimulus-related responses of the amygdala and associated areas within the prefrontal and temporal cortices have been found to be modulated by OT administration. However, there are a number of unresolved issues related to the possible role of sex differences and hormonal status, genetic variability, and individual differences in socio-cognitive functioning. Future studies focusing on these open questions are expected to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the role of the central OT system in humans and may provide the basis for novel treatment approaches for mental disorders characterized by social deficits. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Oxytocin and Social Behav.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.11.003

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Understanding infants' subtle and nonverbal cues requires activity of a mentalizing network including superior temporal sulcus, posterior cingulate gyrus, temporal parietal junction, and vmPFC.

    “Understanding infants’ subtle and nonverbal cues requires the activity of a mentalizing network, including the superior temporal sulcus, the posterior cingulate gyrus, temporal parietal junction, and vmPFC (Kanat et al. 2014; Yang et al. 2015).”

    From A precision medicine approach to oxytocin trials (2017) · cites this paper as Kanat et al. 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kanat, M., Heinrichs, M., & Domes, G.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Domes, Gregor
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
1580
Pages
160-171
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018039576
Cited by
122
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG 1312/2-1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
oxytocin, social brain, intranasal oxytocin, social information processing, amygdala, prefrontal cortex, temporal cortex, sex differences, hormonal status, genetic variation, individual differences, social dysfunction, mental illness, functional neuroimaging
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Animals, Brain, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Oxytocin, Psychotropic Drugs, Sex Characteristics, Social Behavior, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review