The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Objects build orientation, positioning, and curing influence dimensional accuracy and flexural properties of stereolithographically printed resin
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the influence of printing parameters on flexural properties and accuracy of SLA-printed standard objects. METHODS Thirty specimens were printed in 0°, 45° and 90° orientation. Fourth nine more specimens were printed evenly on the build platform. forty more specimens were printed and polymerized with three curing unit. Length, height and width was measured three times for each specimen and compared to the original dimensions. Afterwards all specimens underwent a three-point-bending test to assess their flexural properties. One way ANOVA and the Post-Hoc all pairs Tukey-Kramer HSD test were used for data evaluation. RESULTS The print orientation influences the printing accuracy. The parameters printed along the Z-axis are particularly prone to inaccuracies. Specimens with 45° orientation were found to be the most accurate. Object printed on the borders of build platform a rather prone to inaccuracies than those in the center. The 90° specimens with layer orientation parallel to the axial load showed the superior flexural strength and flexural modulus. The use of different curing unit is unlikely to affect the objects printing accuracy and flexural properties. SIGNIFICANCE The anisotropical behavior of printed specimens with regards to build orientation and positioning was revealed. The understanding of how the adjustable printing parameter influence the printing outcome is important for a precise fabrication of surgical guides. Inaccuracies up to 10% along the Z-axis, as revealed in the present study,may restrict an accurate implant placement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kafle, A., Luis, E., Silwal, R., Pan, H. M., Shrestha, P. L., & Bastola, A. K. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13183101 · Cited by 587
Rapid, large-volume, thermally controlled 3D printing using a mobile liquid interface
Walker, D. A., Hedrick, J. L., & Mirkin, C. A. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax1562 · Cited by 459
3D Printing in Dentistry—State of the Art
Kessler, A., Hickel, R., & Reymus, M. (2020) · Operative Dentistry · doi:10.2341/18-229-l · Cited by 432
Kim, D., Shim, J.-S., Lee, D., Shin, S.-H., Nam, N.-E., Park, K.-H., Shim, J.-S., & Kim, J.-E. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12112762 · Cited by 253
Dimensional Accuracy in 3D Printed Medical Models: A Follow-Up Study on SLA and SLS Technology
Msallem, B., Vavrina, J. J., Beyer, M., Halbeisen, F. S., Lauer, G., Dragu, A., & Thieringer, F. M. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13195848 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Unkovskiy, A., Bui, P. H.-B., Schille, C., Geis-Gerstorfer, J., Huettig, F., & Spintzyk, S.
- Venue
- Dental Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e324-e333
- ISSN
- 0109-5641 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2895056200
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Objects build orientation, positioning, and curing influence dimensional accuracy and flexural properties of stereolithographically printed resin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.dental.2018.09.011
- The paper
- Unkovskiy, A., Bui, P. H.-B., Schille, C., Geis-Gerstorfer, J., Huettig, F., & Spintzyk, S. (2018). Objects build orientation, positioning, and curing influence dimensional accuracy and flexural properties of stereolithographically printed resin. Dental Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.09.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.