The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expertise in design: an overview
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Without first exploring diverse ideas, one can hastily converge to a sub-optimal idea and spend time iterating on it without considering other options - a phenomenon called fixation that hinders creative processes [19, 24, 37].”
From Luminate: Structured Generation and Exploration of Design Space with Large Language Models for Human-AI Co-Creation (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“Second, the literature on creativity consistently underscores our tendency to prematurely converge [19, 24, 36, 37], unless interventions are employed, such as explicitly requiring the generation of multiple ideas at the start of the creative process [24, 54].”
From Luminate: Structured Generation and Exploration of Design Space with Large Language Models for Human-AI Co-Creation (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“studies found that even experts often converge prematurely during creative processes [19, 37], suggesting the human tendency to converge and challenges to diverge.”
From Luminate: Structured Generation and Exploration of Design Space with Large Language Models for Human-AI Co-Creation (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564
EXPERT AND EXCEPTIONAL PERFORMANCE: Evidence of Maximal Adaptation to Task Constraints
Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.273 · Cited by 2,139
Suwa, M., Gero, J., & Purcell, T. (2000) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(99)00034-4 · Cited by 338
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Ho, 2001, Some phenomena of problem decomposition strategy for design thinking: differences between novices and experts, Design Studies, 22, 27, 10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00030-7 · DOI
- Cross, 1998, Expertise in Engineering Design, Research in Engineering Design, 10, 141, 10.1007/BF01607156 · DOI
- Cross, 1994, Design Expertise Amongst Student Designers, Journal of Art and Design Education, 13, 39, 10.1111/j.1476-8070.1994.tb00356.x · DOI
- Atman, 1999, A Comparison of Freshman and Senior Engineering Design Processes, Design Studies, 20, 131, 10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00031-3 · DOI
- Ahmed, 2003, Understanding the Differences Between How Novice and Experienced Designers Approach Design Tasks, Research in Engineering Design, 14, 1, 10.1007/s00163-002-0023-z · DOI
- Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, 2001, Composition and Construction in Experts’ and Novices’ Weaving Design, Design Studies, 22, 44, 10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00038-1 · DOI
- Kavakli, 2002, The Structure of Concurrent Cognitive Actions: a case study on novice and expert designers, Design Studies, 23, 25, 10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00021-7 · DOI
- Lloyd, 1994, Discovering the Design Problem, Design Studies, 15, 125, 10.1016/0142-694X(94)90020-5 · DOI
- Lawson, 1979, Cognitive Strategies in Architectural Design, Ergonomics, 22, 59, 10.1080/00140137908924589 · DOI
- Schön, 1988, Designing: rules, types and worlds, Design Studies, 9, 181, 10.1016/0142-694X(88)90047-6 · DOI
- Goel, 1992, The Structure of Design Problem Spaces, Cognitive Science, 16, 395, 10.1207/s15516709cog1603_3 · DOI
- Lloyd, 1995, Difference in Similarity: interpreting the architectural design process, Planning and Design, 22, 383, 10.1068/b220383 · DOI
- Darke, 1979, The Primary Generator and the Design Process, Design Studies, 1, 36, 10.1016/0142-694X(79)90027-9 · DOI
- Ullman, 1988, A Model of the Mechanical Design Process Based on Empirical Data, Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design and Manufacturing, 2, 33, 10.1017/S0890060400000536 · DOI
- Ball, 1994, Cognitive Processes in Engineering Design: a longitudinal study, Ergonomics, 37, 1753, 10.1080/00140139408964950 · DOI
- Guindon, 1990, Knowledge Exploited by Experts During Software System Design, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 33, 279, 10.1016/S0020-7373(05)80120-8 · DOI
- Kolodner, 1996, Powers of Observation in Creative Design, Design Studies, 17, 385, 10.1016/S0142-694X(96)00021-X · DOI
- Dorst, 2001, Creativity in the Design Process: co-evolution of problem-solution, Design Studies, 22, 425, 10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Fricke, 1996, Successful Individual Approaches in Engineering Design, Research in Engineering Design, 8, 151, 10.1007/BF01608350 · DOI
- Visser, 1990, More or Less Following a Plan During Design: opportunistic deviations in specification, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 33, 247, 10.1016/S0020-7373(05)80119-1 · DOI
- Guindon, 1990, Designing the Design Process: exploiting opportunistic thoughts, Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 305, 10.1207/s15327051hci0502&3_6 · DOI
- Ball, 1995, Structured and Opportunistic Processing in Design: a critical discussion, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, 131, 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1038 · DOI
- Akin, 1995, Design Protocol Data and Novel Design Decisions, Design Studies, 16, 211, 10.1016/0142-694X(94)00010-B · DOI
- Lloyd, 1995, Can Concurrent Verbalisation Reveal Design Cognition?, Design Studies, 16, 237, 10.1016/0142-694X(94)00011-2 · DOI
- P. Lloyd (ed.) Designing in Context, Design Studies 24 (3) (2003) (special issue). · DOI
- Badke-Schaub, 1999, Analysis of Design Projects, Design Studies, 20, 465, 10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00017-4 · DOI
- Busby, 2001, Error and Distributed Cognition in Design, Design Studies, 22, 233, 10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00028-4 · DOI
- Jagodzinski, P, Reid, F and Culverhouse, P (eds.) Ethnographic Approaches to the Study of Engineering Design, Design Studies 21 (4) (2000) (special issue). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mapping the Landscape of Creativity Support Tools in HCI
Frich, J., MacDonald Vermeulen, L., Remy, C., Biskjaer, M. M., & Dalsgaard, P. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300619 · Cited by 410
Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy
Dow, S. P., Glassco, A., Kass, J., Schwarz, M., Schwartz, D. L., & Klemmer, S. R. (2010) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/1879831.1879836 · Cited by 367
Suh, S., Chen, M., Min, B., Li, T. J.-J., & Xia, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642400 · Cited by 148
Sustainability, Human Well-Being, and the Future of Education
(2019) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78580-6 · Cited by 141
Prototyping dynamics: sharing multiple designs improves exploration, group rapport, and results
Dow, S., Fortuna, J., Schwartz, D., Altringer, B., Schwartz, D., & Klemmer, S. (2011) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1978942.1979359 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Cross, N.
- Venue
- Design Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 427-441
- ISSN
- 0142-694X
- Cited by
- 644
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expertise in design: an overview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002
- The paper
- Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: an overview. Design Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002
