Cited by 67Design Education and PracticeCreativity in Education and NeuroscienceArtistic and Creative Research

Creativity and fixation in the real world: A literature review of case study research

Open access
Crilly, Nathan·2019·Design Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.destud.2019.07.002

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crilly, N.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Crilly, Nathan
Venue
Design Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
64
Pages
154-168
ISSN
0142-694X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963013850
Cited by
67
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Design Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Apollo
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Artistic and Creative Research
Keywords
design creativity, design fixation, creative design, inspiration, creative process, design research methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review