Cited by 89Design Education and PracticeCreativity in Education and NeuroscienceInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

A new strategy to reduce design fixation: Presenting partial photographs to designers

Cheng, Peiyao, Mugge, Ruth, Schoormans, Jan P.L.·2014·Design Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.destud.2014.02.004

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Showing partially completed or blurred outputs might be beneficial for introducing ambiguity and pushing ideas in new directions.

    “Another direction is to show partially completed or blurred outputs, which might be beneficial for introducing ambiguity and pushing ideas in new directions [13].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, P., Mugge, R., & Schoormans, J. P. L.
Affiliations
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Mugge, Ruth
Venue
Design Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
374-391
ISSN
0142-694X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069684438
Cited by
89
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4
FWCI
6.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Design Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
design fixation, design originality, creative thinking, design inspiration, design evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review