The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decolonial design practices: Creating safe spaces for plural voices on contested pasts, presents, and futures
Open accessAbstract
This article introduces the concept of the ‘safe space’ in design interventions: a socially developed environment for thoughts, actions, and mutual learning in political and contested contexts. The safe space responds to current challenges within decolonial design practices and calls for a plurality of knowledge and voices. We present a study in which we developed safe spaces with young Namibians by combining core elements of design anthropology and community-based participatory design through interventions, dialogic engagements, and co-design. We demonstrate how the intentional design practice of a safe space enables new ways of working in a contested context. The article presents a framework for designing and developing safe spaces, focusing on working with multiple temporalities and the social production of spaces.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Decolonial approaches to AI design advocate for technologies that are co-created with African communities to address specific challenges, such as digital exclusion and resource constraints [2, 23, 65, 66, 77].”
From Designing Responsible AI with Indigenous Communities: Towards Participatory AI with ovaHimba and San People in Namibia (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cites
Decolonizing Participatory Design: Memory Making in Namibia
Charlotte Smith, R., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Paula Kambunga, A., & Krishnamurthy, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1 · doi:10.1145/3385010.3385021 · Cited by 74
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Awori, 2016, Decolonising technology design, Proceedings of the First African Conference on Human Computer Interaction, 226
- Bidwell, 2016, Decolonising HCI and interaction design discourse: Some considerations in planning AfriCHI, XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, 22, 22, 10.1145/2930884 · DOI
- Boden, 2009, The Khwe and West Caprivi before Namibian independence: Matters of land, labour, power and alliance, Journal of Namibian Studie, 5, 27
- Bustamante Duarte, 2021, Safe spaces in participatory design with young forced migrants, CoDesign, 17, 188, 10.1080/15710882.2019.1654523 · DOI
- Calderon Salazar, 2020, PD otherwise will be pluriversal (or it won't be), Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise -, 1, 107, 10.1145/3385010.3385027 · DOI
- Cusicanqui, 2012, Ch’ixinakax utxiwa: A reflection on the practices and discourses of decolonization, South Atlantic Quarterly, 111, 95, 10.1215/00382876-1472612 · DOI
- Goagoses, 2018, Enhancing commitment to participatory design initiatives, Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume, 2, 1
- Kambunga, 2021, Pluriversal design: A virtual decolonising exhibition. C&T 2021: Supplementary proceedings of the 10th International conference on communities and technologies, Comprehensive Therapy
- Kambunga, 2020, Challenging authorities: A postcolonial interactive exhibition codesigned by Namibian born-frees, Culture and Computer Science – Extended Reality, 302
- Kamwi, 2019, Operation Kalahari Desert’ kicks off, The Namibian
- Kössler, 2007, Facing a fragmented past: Memory, culture and politics in Namibia, Journal of Southern African Studies, 33, 361, 10.1080/03057070701292640 · DOI
- Lazem, 2021, Challenges and paradoxes in decolonising HCI: A critical discussion, Computer Supported Cooperative Work
- Leitão, 2022, Special forum: Designing a world of many centers, Design and Culture, 14, 247, 10.1080/17547075.2022.2110796 · DOI
- Luck, 2018, What is it that makes participation in design participatory design?, Design Studies, 59, 1, 10.1016/j.destud.2018.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Mignolo, 2007, Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality, Cultural Studies, 21, 449, 10.1080/09502380601162647 · DOI
- Muller, 2012, Participatory design: The third space in human– computer interaction, Vol. 20126252, 1125
- Mushaandja, 2021, Embodiments of love on the margins of Windhoek's cinematic landscape, Social Dynamics, 47, 100, 10.1080/02533952.2021.1899735 · DOI
- Ndlovu-Gatsheni, 2015, Decoloniality as the future of Africa: Decoloniality, Africa, power, knowledge, being, History Compass, 13, 485, 10.1111/hic3.12264 · DOI
- Nisha, 2022, Lost in imagined space: A psychoanalysis of participatory design, Design Studies, 81, 10.1016/j.destud.2022.101108 · DOI
- Otto, 2016, History in and for design, Journal of Design History, 29, 58, 10.1093/jdh/epv044 · DOI
- Otto, 2018, Camera, intervention and cultural critique: An introduction, Visual Anthropology, 31, 307, 10.1080/08949468.2018.1497328 · DOI
- Quijano, 2007, COLONIALITY and modernity/rationality, Cultural Studies, 21, 168, 10.1080/09502380601164353 · DOI · Paper page
- van Rooyen, 2021, The German attack on the witboois at Hornkranz, Namibia, april 1893, Scientia Militaria, 49, 10.5787/49-1-1249 · DOI
- Sabiescu, 2014, Emerging spaces in community-based participatory design: Reflections from two case studies, Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference on Research Papers - PDC, ’14, 1
- Scheuerman, 2018, Safe spaces and safe places: Unpacking technology-mediated experiences of safety and harm with transgender people, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 1, 10.1145/3274424 · DOI
- Schultz, 2018, What is at stake with decolonizing design? A roundtable, Design and Culture, 10, 81, 10.1080/17547075.2018.1434368 · DOI
- Smith, 2022, Editorial: Design anthropology, Design Studies, 80, 10.1016/j.destud.2022.101081 · DOI
- Smith, 2014, Participatory heritage innovation: Designing dialogic sites of engagement, Digital Creativity, 25, 255, 10.1080/14626268.2014.904796 · DOI
- Smith, 2021, Decolonizing design practices: Towards pluriversality, Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1
- Smith, 2020, Decolonising participatory design practices: Towards participations otherwise, Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise -, 2, 206, 10.1145/3384772.3385172 · DOI
- Stuedahl, 2021, Design anthropological approaches in collaborative museum curation, Design Studies, 75, 10.1016/j.destud.2021.101021 · DOI
- Thomassen, 2009, The uses and meaning of liminality, International Political Anthropology, 2, 5
- Tlostanova, 2017, On decolonizing design, Design Philosophy Papers, 15, 51, 10.1080/14487136.2017.1301017 · DOI
- Tuli, 2020, Menstrual (Im)Mobilities and safe spaces, CHI ’20. CHI 2020
- Van Amstel, 2021, Insurgent design coalitions: The history of the design and oppression network. Pluriversal design special interest group, Pivot 2021 Dismantling/Reassembling: Tools for Alternative Futures, 10.21606/pluriversal.2021.0018 · DOI
- wa Thiong’o, 1998, Decolonising the mind, Diogenes, 46, 101, 10.1177/039219219804618409 · DOI
- Winschiers-Theophilus, 2013, Toward an afro-centric indigenous HCI paradigm, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29, 243, 10.1080/10447318.2013.765763 · DOI
- Zuljevic, 2021, Historicising design space: Uses of the past in participatory prefiguring of spatial development, Design Studies, 73, 10.1016/j.destud.2021.100993 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Indongo, N. N., Smith, R. C., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Kandjengo, S., & Mbinge, U. (2026) · Proceedings of the 19th Participatory Design Conference 2026, Vol. 1: Full Papers · doi:10.1145/3796624.3796667 · Cited by 1
“Decolonial approaches to AI design advocate for technologies that are co-created with African communities to address specific challenges, such as digital exclusion and resource constraints [2, 23, 65, 66, 77].”
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kambunga, A. P., Smith, R. C., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., & Otto, T.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Rachel Charlotte
- Venue
- Design Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-05
- Volume
- 86
- Pages
- 101170
- ISSN
- 0142-694X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4360966875
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 11.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Design Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- decolonial design, safe spaces, multiple knowledges, design anthropology, co-design, dialogic engagement, multiple temporalities, production of space, youth, Namibia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review