CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 105Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of a diabetes education programme (PRIMAS) for people with type 1 diabetes: Results of a randomized trial

Hermanns, Norbert, Kulzer, Bernhard, Ehrmann, Dominic, Bergis-Jurgan, Nikola, Haak, Thomas·2013·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
DOI 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.10.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective In a randomized, multi-centre trial, the efficacy of a self-management-oriented education programme (PRIMAS) for people with type 1 diabetes was compared with an established education programme as control group (CG). Primary outcome was the effect on glycaemic control in a 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the impact on emotional aspects, self-management related aspects and hypoglycaemia problems. Methods The study was conducted in an outpatient setting. 160 participants were randomized. Baseline characteristics in PRIMAS and CG were similar (age 45.1±13.5 vs. 45.9±13.1 years, p=.716; diabetes duration 18.8±12.3 vs. 19.8±13.4 years, p=.615; BMI 26.5±4.6 vs. 27.5±5.0kg/m(2), p=.236; HbA1c 8.3±1.1 vs. 8.1±1.0%, p=.236). Results At follow-up there was a significant 0.4 percentage points greater reduction of HbA1c in PRIMAS compared to CG (Δ -0.4±1.0% vs. Δ 0.0±0.6%; p=.012). Also, diabetes-related distress (Δ -0.3±0.7 vs. -0.1±0.4, p=.032) and dissatisfaction with diabetes treatment (Δ -3.3±6.9 vs. -1.9±5.6, p=.024) decreased more in PRIMAS. Diabetes empowerment (Δ 2.6±5.9 vs. 0.8±5.1, p=.037) and diabetes self-efficacy (Δ 1.4±3.6 vs. 0.2±4.0, p=.013) increased in PRIMAS. Incidence of severe hypoglycemia, hypoglycemia awareness, diabetes knowledge, and self-care behaviour improved in both groups with no significant differences between groups. Conclusion PRIMAS is more effective in lowering HbA1c than a previously established education programmes and also showed superiority in reducing diabetes-related distress and increasing diabetes empowerment, diabetes self-efficacy and satisfaction with insulin therapy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.10.009

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kempe, 2002, Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung von Selbstmanagementfertigkeiten, Diabetes und Stoffwechsel, 11, 144
  2. Kulzer, 1995, Entwicklung eines Problemfragebogens für Diabetiker zur Identifikation von Schwierigkeiten im Umgang mit der Krankheit, Verhaltenstherapie, 5, A72

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hermanns, N., Kulzer, B., Ehrmann, D., Bergis-Jurgan, N., & Haak, T.
Affiliations
  • German Diabetes Center Mergentheim (DE)
  • Forschungsinstitut der Diabetes Akademie Mergentheim (DE)
Corresponding author
Hermanns, Norbert
ORCID
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
102
Issue
3
Pages
149-157
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.diabres.2013.10.009
OpenAlex
W2052670832
Cited by
105
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 3
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
diabetes education, glycemic control, HbA1c, diabetes distress, diabetes empowerment, diabetes self-efficacy, hypoglycemia, hypoglycemia awareness, diabetes knowledge, self-care behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Awareness, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Germany, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Power, Psychological, Prospective Studies, Self Care, Incidence, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review