Cited by 78Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchHealth and Wellbeing Research

Self-efficacy, self-care and glycemic control in Saudi Arabian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional survey

Saad, Ahmad M.J., Younes, Zeina M.H., Ahmed, Hafez, Brown, Jason A., Al Owesie, Rafat M., Hassoun, Ahmed A.K.·2018·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Aims To determine the prevalence of diabetes self-care activities among type 2 diabetes patients and examine the association between socio-demographic and clinical parameters, diabetes self-care activities, and glycemic control among type 2 diabetes patients. Methods A cross sectional study was conducted among patients with diabetes (n = 123) at the Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Humanitarian City (SBAHC). A regression model was used to examine the variables that predicted glycemic control. Moreover, a regression analysis examining the effect of each self-efficacy subscale on its respective diabetes self -management (DSM) behavior was carried out. Results The most frequently reported DSM behaviors were foot care followed by medication taking self-management behavior. The least frequently reported DSM behaviors were exercise self-management behavior and blood sugar testing behavior. Self-efficacy was associated with higher levels of diet, exercise, blood sugar testing, and medication taking self-management behaviors. Diet self-management behaviors and oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) use were significantly independent predictors of glycemic control HbA1c Conclusions The findings can serve to help clinicians have a better understanding on the extent to which different self-efficacy parameters have an influence on self-management behaviors, which will in turn lead to better glycemic control and thus improved HbA1c levels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.12.014

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saad, A. M. J., Younes, Z. M. H., Ahmed, H., Brown, J. A., Al Owesie, R. M., & Hassoun, A. A. K.
Affiliations
  • Dubai Health Authority (AE)
  • Dubai Medical College (AE)
Corresponding author
Saad, Ahmad M.J.
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
137
Pages
28-36
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2776372788
Cited by
78
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, diabetes self-care, self-efficacy, glycemic control, HbA1c, diabetes self-management behavior, foot care, medication adherence, blood glucose monitoring, oral antidiabetic drugs, Saudi patients
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Saudi Arabia, Self Care, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review