Cited by 19Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Early Screening and Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) and Its Impact on Perinatal Outcomes

Bastian, Beenu, Smithers, Lisa Gaye, Pape, Alexia, Davis, Warren, Fu, K., Francois, Monique·2024·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Aims To compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes following early diagnosis compared with routine diagnosis of gestational diabetes (GDM). Methods In this observational study, 3494 women were categorised by weeks of gestation at GDM diagnosis: early GDM (≤20 weeks) and routine GDM (>20 weeks). The early GDM group was further divided by treatment commencement as immediate (<12 weeks) and delayed (12-20 weeks) and by diagnostic fasting blood glucose as higher-FBG (5.3-6.0 mmol/L) and lower-FBG group (FBG 5.1-5.2 mmol/L). Primary outcomes were large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA). Generalized linear models used to calculate risk ratios and adjusted for confounding. Results Risk ratios (RR) for LGA and SGA were similar for early versus routine diagnosis, and immediate versus delayed treatment. The higher-FBG immediate treatment group had a lower risk of newborn respiratory distress (RR 0.52, 95 %CI 0.34, 0.81) and emergency caesarean (RR 0.55, 95 %CI 0.34, 0.88) compared to the higher-FBG delayed treatment group. Among the lower-FBG group, no such benefits were seen. Conclusions Fasting glucose levels modified the effects of early treatment of GDM where a higher-FBG with immediate treatment appears to reduce perinatal complications, but treating women with lower-FBG early has no benefits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111890

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bastian, B., Smithers, L. G., Pape, A., Davis, W., Fu, K., & Francois, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
  • Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Bastian, Beenu
  • Smithers, Lisa Gaye
  • Pape, Alexia
  • Davis, Warren
  • Fu, K.
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
217
Pages
111890
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403561132
Cited by
18
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8
FWCI
8.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute (R5761)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1177234)
  • Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, early diagnosis, fasting blood glucose, treatment timing, large for gestational age, small for gestational age, neonatal respiratory distress, emergency cesarean section, perinatal outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Female, Fetal Macrosomia, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Diagnosis, Diabetes, Gestational, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review