Cited by 121Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Early gestational diabetes screening in obese women: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Harper, Lorie M., Jauk, Victoria, Longo, Sherri, Biggio, Joseph R., Szychowski, Jeff M., Tita, Alan T.·2020·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Background Although in 2013 the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommended early screening for gestational diabetes in obese women, no studies demonstrate an improvement in perinatal outcomes with this strategy. Objective We sought to determine whether early screening for gestational diabetes improves perinatal outcomes in obese women. Materials and methods Randomized controlled trial comparing early gestational diabetes screening (14-20 weeks) to routine screening (24-28 weeks) in obese women (body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2) at 2 tertiary care centers in the United States. Screening was performed using a 50-g, 1-hour glucose challenge test followed by a 100-g, 3-hour glucose tolerance test if the initial screen was ≥135 mg/dL. Gestational diabetes was diagnosed using Carpenter-Coustan criteria. Women not diagnosed at 14 to 20 weeks were rescreened at 24 to 28 weeks. Exclusion criteria were pre-existing diabetes, major medical illness, bariatric surgery, and prior cesarean delivery. The primary outcome was a composite of macrosomia (>4000 g), primary cesarean delivery, hypertensive disease of pregnancy, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, and neonatal hypoglycemia (assessed within 48 hours of birth). Results A total of 962 women were randomized, and outcomes were available for 922. Of these 922 women, 459 (49.8%) were assigned to early screen and 463 (50.2%) to routine screen. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. In the early screening group, 69 (15.0%; 95% confidence interval, 11.9-18.6%) were diagnosed with gestational diabetes: 29 (6.3%; 95% confidence interval, 4.3-8.9%) at <20 weeks and 40 (8.7%; 95% confidence interval, 6.3-11.7%) at >24 weeks. Of those randomized to routine screening, 56 (12.1%; 95% confidence interval, 9.3-15.4%) had gestational diabetes. Early screening did not reduce the incidence of the primary outcome (56.9% in the early screen versus 50.8% in the routine screen, P = .07; relative risk, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.26). Conclusion Early screening for gestational diabetes in obese women did not reduce the composite perinatal outcome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.12.021

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. [2]Dodd JM, Grivell RM, Nguyen AM, Chan A, Robinson JS. Maternal and perinatal health outcomes by body mass index category. The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology 2011; 51: 136– 40. 21466515
  2. [3]ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 30, September 2001 (replaces Technical Bulletin Number 200, December 1994). Gestational diabetes. Obstetrics and gynecology 2001; 98: 525– 38. 11547793
  3. [6]Roman AS, Rebarber A, FOX NS, The effect of maternal obesity on pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011; 24: 723– 7. 21366395
  4. [7]ACOG Committee Opinion number 315, September 2005. Obesity in pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology 2005; 106: 671– 5. 16135613
  5. [8]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 137: Gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstetrics and gynecology 2013; 122: 406– 16. 23969827
  6. [10]Mission JF, Catov J, Deihl TE, Feghali M, Scifres C. Early Pregnancy Diabetes Screening and Diagnosis: Prevalence, Rates of Abnormal Test Results, and Associated Factors. Obstetrics and gynecology 2017; 130: 1136– 42. 29016493
  7. [14]O’Sullivan JB, Mahan CM. CRITERIA FOR THE ORAL GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST IN PREGNANCY. Diabetes 1964; 13: 278– 85. 14166677
  8. [15]Stiewig M, Jackson DN, Howard DL. Does serum hemoglobin A1C during early pregnancy predict performance on the 1-hour glucose challenge test? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019: 1– 3. 31230488
  9. [16]American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Professional Practice Committee: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2019. Diabetes care 2019; 42: S13– S27. 30559225
  10. [17]Gynecologists; ACoOa. Practice Bulletin No. 137: Gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstetrics and gynecology 2013; 122: 406– 16. 23969827
  11. [18]Duryea EL, Hawkins JS, McIntire DD, Casey BM, Leveno KJ. A revised birth weight reference for the United States. Obstetrics and gynecology 2014; 124: 16– 22. 24901276
  12. [19]Boulet SL, Alexander GR, Salihu HM, Pass M. Macrosomic births in the united states: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2003; 188: 1372– 8. 12748514
  13. [20]American College OF Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. Obstetrics and gynecology 2019; 133: e1– e25. 30575675
  14. [21]American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on H. Management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant 35 or more weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 297– 316. 15231951
  15. [22]Maisels MJ, Watchko JF, Bhutani VK, Stevenson DK. An approach to the management of hyperbilirubinemia in the preterm infant less than 35 weeks of gestation. J Perinatol 2012; 32: 660– 4. 22678141
  16. [23]Hong WY, Biggio JR, Tita A, Harper LM. Impact of Early Screening for Gestational Diabetes on Perinatal Outcomes in High-Risk Women. American journal of perinatology 2016; 33: 758– 64. 26890436 PMC4919164
  17. [24]Feghali MN, Abebe KZ, Comer DM, Caritis S, Catov JM, Scifres CM. Pregnancy outcomes in women with an early diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes research and clinical practice 2018; 138: 177– 86. 29427694 PMC5910191
  18. [25]Osmundson SS, Norton ME, El-Sayed YY, Carter S, Faig JC, Kitzmiller JL. Early Screening and Treatment of Women with Prediabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. American journal of perinatology 2016; 33: 172– 9. 26344009
  19. [26]Roeder HA, Moore TR, Wolfson MT, Gamst AC, Ramos GA. Treating hyperglycemia in early pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM 2019; 1: 33– 41. 33319755

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harper, L. M., Jauk, V., Longo, S., Biggio, J. R., Szychowski, J. M., & Tita, A. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Ochsner Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Harper, Lorie M.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
222
Issue
5
Pages
495.e1-495.e8
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2905969115
Cited by
121
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1
FWCI
9.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR001417)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Utah
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD001258)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, early screening, maternal obesity, perinatal outcomes, macrosomia, cesarean section, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, glucose challenge test, glucose tolerance test, Carpenter and Coustan criteria, screening timing, gestational age at diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Mass Screening, Obesity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Diabetes, Gestational, Early Diagnosis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review