Cited by 40Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingUrinary Tract Infections Management

Improved standardization and potential for shortened time to results with BD Kiestra™ total laboratory automation of early urine cultures: A prospective comparison with manual processing

Graham, Maryza, Tilson, Leanne, Streitberg, Richard, Hamblin, John, Korman, Tony M.·2016·Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease

Abstract

We compared the results of 505 urine specimens prospectively processed by both conventional manual processing (MP) with 16-24h incubation to BD Kiestra™ Total Laboratory Automation (TLA) system with a shortened incubation of 14h: 97% of culture results were clinically concordant. TLA processing was associated with improved standardization of time of first culture reading and total incubation time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.06.020

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Full laboratory automation improves culture processing and mitigates staffing challenges.

    “Full laboratory automation has already been shown to improve culture processing and mitigate staffing challenges (7–9).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graham, M., Tilson, L., Streitberg, R., Hamblin, J., & Korman, T. M.
Affiliations
  • Monash Medical Centre (AU)
  • Monash Health (AU)
Corresponding author
Graham, Maryza
Venue
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
86
Issue
1
Pages
1-4
ISSN
0732-8893 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2463477534
Cited by
40
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Urinary Tract Infections Management
Keywords
total laboratory automation, urine culture, time to result, standardization, clinical concordance, urinary tract infection
MeSH terms
Bacteriological Techniques, Humans, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Urinary Tract Infections, Automation, Laboratory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review