Evaluation of the WASPLab Segregation Software To Automatically Analyze Urine Cultures Using Routine Blood and MacConkey Agars
Open accessAbstract
Automation of the clinical microbiology laboratory has become more prominent as laboratories face higher specimen volumes and understaffing and are becoming more consolidated. One recent advancement is the use of digital image analysis to rapidly distinguish between chromogenic growth for screening bacterial cultures. In this study, colony segregation software developed by Copan (Brescia, Italy) was evaluated to distinguish between significant growth and no growth of urine cultures plated onto standard blood and MacConkey agars. Specimens from 3 sites were processed on a WASP instrument (Copan) and incubated on the WASPLab platform (Copan), and plates were imaged at 0 and 24 hours postinoculation. Images were read by technologists following validated laboratory protocols (VLPs), and results were recorded in the laboratory information systems (LIS). Image analysis performed colony counts on the 24-hour images, and results were compared with the VLP. A total of 12,931 urine cultures were tested and analyzed with an overall sensitivity and specificity of 99.8% and 72.0%, respectively. After secondary review, 91.1% of manual-positive/automation-negative specimens were due to expert rules that reported the plate as contaminated or growing only normal flora and not due to threshold counts. Nine specimens were found to be manual-positive/automation-negative; a secondary review demonstrated that the results of 8 of these specimens were due to growth of microcolonies that were program…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior studies have shown the accuracy of these algorithms across multiple specimen types and media.
“Prior studies have shown the accuracy of these algorithms across multiple specimen types and media (2–6).”
From Improving turnaround times with artificial intelligence in microbiology (2026) · cites this paper as [4]
Cites
Faron, M. L., Buchan, B. W., Coon, C., Liebregts, T., van Bree, A., Jansz, A. R., Soucy, G., Korver, J., & Ledeboer, N. A. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01040-16 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationGraham, M., Tilson, L., Streitberg, R., Hamblin, J., & Korman, T. M. (2016) · Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease · doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.06.020 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Benefits Derived from Full Laboratory Automation in Microbiology: a Tale of Four Laboratories
Culbreath, K., Piwonka, H., Korver, J., & Noorbakhsh, M. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01969-20 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Improving turnaround times with artificial intelligence in microbiology
Davidson, R., Heinstein, C., Patriquin, G., Goneau, L. W., Brown, L. A., & Hill, B. J. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.00354-26 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Faron, M. L., Buchan, B. W., Relich, R. F., Clark, J., & Ledeboer, N. A.
- Affiliations
- Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
- Wisconsin Diagnostic Laboratories, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
- Indiana University Health (US)
- Alverno Clinical Laboratories, Hammond, Indiana, USA
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2020-03-25
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- PMC
- PMC7098764
- OpenAlex
- W3000278843
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Urinary Tract Infections Management
- Keywords
- urine culture, automated colony counting, digital image analysis, blood agar, MacConkey agar, false-negative results, microcolonies, laboratory automation
- MeSH terms
- Bacteriological Techniques, Culture Media, Humans, Italy, Software, Urine, Automation, Laboratory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review