Cited by 133Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The development of attention to simple and complex visual stimuli in infants: Behavioral and psychophysiological measures

Open access
Richards, John E.·2010·Developmental Review

Abstract

The study of visual attention in infants has used presentation of single simple stimuli, multi-dimensional stimuli, and complex dynamic video presentations. There are both continuities and discontinuities in the findings on attention and attentiveness to stimulus complexity. A continuity is a pattern of looking that is found in the early part of infancy that remains throughout adulthood. A discontinuity is an emerging sensitivity to the content of the information in the stimulus presentations and alterations in patterns of attention based upon stimulus comprehensibility. The current paper reviews some of these findings with particular application to complex video presentations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dr.2010.03.005

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Richards JE Turner ED Distractibility during extended viewing of television in the early preschool years Child Development 2001 72 963 972 11480948
  2. Richards JE Turner ED Distractibility during extended viewing of television in the early preschool years Child Development 2001 72 963 972 11480948

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richards, J. E.
Affiliations
University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Richards, John E.
Venue
Developmental Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
203-219
ISSN
0273-2297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108289092
Cited by
133
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R37-HD18942)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
infant visual attention, stimulus complexity, dynamic stimuli, psychophysiological measures, early infancy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review