Cited by 28Multisensory perception and integrationChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and Synchronization

Infant Attention to Dynamic Audiovisual Stimuli: Look Duration From 3 to 9 Months of Age

Reynolds, Greg D., Zhang, Dantong, Guy, Maggie W.·2013·Infancy

Abstract

The goal of this study was to examine developmental change in visual attention to dynamic visual and audiovisual stimuli in 3‐, 6‐, and 9‐month‐old infants. Infant look duration was measured during exposure to dynamic geometric patterns and Sesame Street video clips under three different stimulus modality conditions: unimodal visual, synchronous audiovisual, and asynchronous audiovisual. Infants looked longer toward Sesame Street stimuli than geometric patterns, and infants also looked longer during multimodal audiovisual (synchronous and asynchronous) presentations than during unimodal visual presentations. There was a three‐way interaction of age, stimulus type, and stimulus modality. Significant differences were found within and between age groups related to stimulus modality (visual or audiovisual) while viewing Sesame Street clips. No significant interaction was found between age and stimulus type while infants viewed dynamic geometric patterns. These findings indicate that patterns of developmental change in infant attention vary based on stimulus complexity and modality of presentation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2012.00134.x

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the present study, a normative sample of low-risk typically developing infants and infants from low and high-risk groups who did not later develop ASD showed a longer peak look to faces than objects, decreased peak look duration over the first year, and dishabituated to a novel face or an object after delays of up to a minute.

    “Consistent with previous work, in the present study, a normative sample of low-risk typically developing infants and infants from low and high-risk groups who did not later develop ASD showed a longer peak look to faces than objects [63], decreased peak look duration over the first year [75], and dishabituated to a novel face or an object after delays of up to a minute [76].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reynolds, G. D., Zhang, D., & Guy, M. W.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Reynolds, Greg D.
Venue
Infancy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-12
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
554-577
ISSN
  • 1525-0008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7078
OpenAlex
W2116047869
Cited by
28
References
62
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Infancy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
infant visual attention, audiovisual integration, dynamic visual stimuli, geometric patterns, Sesame Street, stimulus modality, stimulus complexity, infant development, cross-modal attention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review