Cited by 49Computational Drug Discovery MethodsPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions

In silico assessment of adverse drug reactions and associated mechanisms

Ivanov, Sergey M., Lagunin, Alexey A., Poroikov, Vladimir V.·2016·Drug Discovery Today

Abstract

During recent years, various in silico approaches have been developed to estimate chemical and biological drug features, for example chemical fragments, protein targets, pathways, among others, that correlate with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and explain the associated mechanisms. These features have also been used for the creation of predictive models that enable estimation of ADRs during the early stages of drug development. In this review, we discuss various in silico approaches to predict these features for a certain drug, estimate correlations with ADRs, establish causal relationships between selected features and ADR mechanisms and create corresponding predictive models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drudis.2015.07.018

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ivanov, S. M., Lagunin, A. A., & Poroikov, V. V.
Affiliations
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RU)
Corresponding author
Poroikov, Vladimir V.
Venue
Drug Discovery Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
58-71
ISSN
1359-6446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1123550655
Cited by
49
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug Discovery Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Russian Science Foundation (14-15-00449)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Keywords
adverse drug reactions, in silico prediction, drug safety, prediction model, molecular fragments, protein targets, biological pathways, early drug development, computational toxicology
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Factors, Computer Simulation, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Drug Discovery, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review