Cited by 899Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesComputational Drug Discovery Methods

A side effect resource to capture phenotypic effects of drugs

Open access
Kuhn, Michael, Campillos, Monica, Letunic, Ivica, Jensen, Lars Juhl, Bork, Peer·2010·Molecular Systems Biology

Abstract

The molecular understanding of phenotypes caused by drugs in humans is essential for elucidating mechanisms of action and for developing personalized medicines. Side effects of drugs (also known as adverse drug reactions) are an important source of human phenotypic information, but so far research on this topic has been hampered by insufficient accessibility of data. Consequently, we have developed a public, computer-readable side effect resource (SIDER) that connects 888 drugs to 1450 side effect terms. It contains information on frequency in patients for one-third of the drug-side effect pairs. For 199 drugs, the side effect frequency of placebo administration could also be extracted. We illustrate the potential of SIDER with a number of analyses. The resource is freely available for academic research at http://sideeffects.embl.de.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/msb.2009.98

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-throughput screening using sophisticated models can identify compounds that mitigate disease symptoms without necessitating pre-existing knowledge about drug-target interactions.

    “Notably, high-throughput screening using sophisticated models can identify compounds that mitigate disease symptoms without necessitating pre-existing knowledge about the drug-target interactions.29,30”

    From Drug repurposing for cancer therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses databases of cellular phenotypes and the potential of large-scale computational methods; it does not describe screening sophisticated models to find compounds that relieve disease symptoms. Searches for high-throughput screening, symptom mitigation, and drug-target-independent screening found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Ashburn TT, Thor KB (2004) Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3: 673– 683 15286734
  2. Bender A, Scheiber J, Glick M, Davies JW, Azzaoui K, Hamon J, Urban L, Whitebread S, Jenkins JL (2007) Analysis of pharmacology data and the prediction of adverse drug reactions and off-target effects from chemical structure. Chem Med Chem 2: 861– 873 17477341
  3. Campillos M, Kuhn M, Gavin AC, Jensen LJ, Bork P (2008) Drug target identification using side-effect similarity. Science 321: 263– 266 18621671
  4. Fliri AF, Loging WT, Volkmann RA (2007) Analysis of system structure-function relationships. Chem Med Chem 2: 1774– 1782 17952882
  5. Krejsa CM, Horvath D, Rogalski SL, Penzotti JE, Mao B, Barbosa F, Migeon JC (2003) Predicting ADME properties and side effects: the BioPrint approach. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 6: 470– 480 12951810
  6. Kuhn M, Campillos M, González P, Jensen LJ, Bork P (2008) Large-scale prediction of drug-target relationships. FEBS Lett 582: 1283– 1290 18291108
  7. Liebler DC, Guengerich FP (2005) Elucidating mechanisms of drug-induced toxicity. Nat Rev Drug Discov 4: 410– 420 15864270
  8. Liu T, Lin Y, Wen X, Jorissen RN, Gilson MK (2007) BindingDB: a web-accessible database of experimentally determined protein-ligand binding affinities. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D198– D201 17145705 PMC1751547
  9. Lue TF (2000) Erectile dysfunction. N Engl J Med 342: 1802– 1813 10853004
  10. Pafilis E, O'Donoghue SI, Jensen LJ, Horn H, Kuhn M, Brown NP, Schneider R (2009) Reflect: augmented browsing for the life scientist. Nat Biotechnol 27: 508– 510 19513049
  11. Seiler KP, George GA, Happ MP, Bodycombe NE, Carrinski HA, Norton S, Brudz S, Sullivan JP, Muhlich J, Serrano M, Ferraiolo P, Tolliday NJ, Schreiber SL, Clemons PA (2008) ChemBank: a small-molecule screening and cheminformatics resource database. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D351– D359 17947324 PMC2238881
  12. Shiri R, Koskimaki J, Hakkinen J, Auvinen A, Tammela TL, Hakama M (2007) Cardiovascular drug use and the incidence of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 19: 208– 212 16900205
  13. Wheeler DL, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bryant SH, Canese K, Chetvernin V, Church DM, DiCuccio M, Edgar R, Federhen S, Geer LY, Kapustin Y, Khovayko O, Landsman D, Lipman DJ, Madden TL, Maglott DR, Ostell J, Miller V, Pruitt KD (2007) Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D5– 12 17170002 PMC1781113
  14. Wishart DS, Knox C, Guo AC, Cheng D, Shrivastava S, Tzur D, Gautam B, Hassanali M (2008) DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D901– D906 18048412 PMC2238889

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuhn, M., Campillos, M., Letunic, I., Jensen, L. J., & Bork, P.
Affiliations
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Molecular Systems Biology
Published
2010-01-19
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
343-343
ISSN
1744-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142572836
Cited by
899
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 80 · 2015: 102 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 47
FWCI
72.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Systems Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
adverse drug reactions, SIDER, drug mechanisms of action, personalized medicine
MeSH terms
Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Phenotype, Structure-Activity Relationship, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Risk Assessment, Databases as Topic, Internet, Data Mining, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review