Cited by 149Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesYouth, Drugs, and ViolenceOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

The relationship between crystalline methamphetamine use and methamphetamine dependence

McKetin, Rebecca, Kelly, Erin, McLaren, Jennifer·2006·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background The aim of the current study was to determine whether crystalline methamphetamine users are more dependent on methamphetamine than people who use other forms of the drug, and if so, whether this could be accounted for by their methamphetamine use history.Method A structured face-to-face interview was used to assess drug use patterns and demographics among a convenience sample of 309 regular methamphetamine users from Sydney, Australia. Dependence on methamphetamine in the past year was measured using the Severity of Dependence Scale. The use of crystalline methamphetamine in the past year was confirmed using a photographic identification sheet.Results Participants who had used crystalline methamphetamine in the past year were significantly more likely to be dependent on methamphetamine than participants who took only other forms of methamphetamine during this time (61% versus 39%). Methamphetamine dependence was also associated with injecting or smoking methamphetamine (67% and 58%, respectively versus 30% for intranasal or oral use), using methamphetamine more than weekly (68% versus 34%), having used the drug for more than 5 years (61% versus 36%), and having used 'base' methamphetamine in the past year (59% versus 39%). Crystalline methamphetamine use remained significantly associated with methamphetamine dependence after adjusting for these patterns of methamphetamine use.Conclusions Methamphetamine users who took crystalline methamphetamine in the past year were more likely to be dependent than methamphetamine users who had not taken the crystalline form of the drug during this time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.04.007

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKetin, R., Kelly, E., & McLaren, J.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
McKetin, Rebecca
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-12
Volume
85
Issue
3
Pages
198-204
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000961004
Cited by
145
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
methamphetamine dependence, route of administration, injection, smoking, duration of drug use, Severity of Dependence Scale
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Drug Administration Routes, Female, Humans, Male, Methamphetamine, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review