Cited by 106Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and AccessSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Brief case finding tools for anxiety disorders: Validation of GAD-7 and GAD-2 in addictions treatment

Delgadillo, Jaime, Payne, Scott, Gilbody, Simon, Godfrey, Christine, Gore, Stuart, Jessop, Dawn, Dale, Veronica·2012·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background Anxiety disorders are the most common mental health problems and often co-exist with substance use. Little evidence exists to support the use of brief screening tools for anxiety disorders in routine addictions treatment. This is the first study to test the validity and reliability of GAD-7 and GAD-2 in an outpatient drugs treatment population.Methods A sample of 103 patients completed brief screening questionnaires and took part in structured diagnostic assessments using CIS-R. A subgroup of 60 patients completed retests after 4 weeks. The results of brief questionnaires were compared to those of gold-standard diagnostic interviews using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Psychometric properties were also calculated to evaluate the validity and reliability of self-completed questionnaires.Results A GAD-7 score ≥ 9 had a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 86% for any anxiety disorder, also displaying adequate temporal stability at repeated measurements (intra-class correlation=0.85) and high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.91). A GAD-2 score ≥ 2 had 94% sensitivity and 53% specificity, with adequate internal consistency (0.82).Conclusions GAD-7 adequately detected the presence of an anxiety disorder in drug and alcohol users; although this study was limited by sample size to determine its reliability for specific diagnoses. Results in this small sample suggest that GAD-7 may be a useful screening tool in addiction services, although replication in a larger sample is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.03.011

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Delgadillo, J., Payne, S., Gilbody, S., Godfrey, C., Gore, S., Jessop, D., & Dale, V.
Affiliations
  • Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
  • Western Health and Social Care Trust (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
125
Issue
1-2
Pages
37-42
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047983963
Cited by
106
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
anxiety disorders, GAD-7, GAD-2, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, screening tool, brief screening, addiction treatment, substance use disorders, psychometric validation, sensitivity and specificity, temporal stability, internal consistency
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Outpatients, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, ROC Curve, Reproducibility of Results, Area Under Curve, Substance-Related Disorders, International Classification of Diseases, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review