Cited by 297Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Diagnostic Validity of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7) among Pregnant Women

Open access
Zhong, Qiu-Yue, Gelaye, Bizu, Zaslavsky, Alan M., Fann, Jesse R., Rondon, Marta B., Sánchez, Sixto E., Williams, Michelle A.·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) during pregnancy is associated with several adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. A reliable and valid screening tool for GAD should lead to earlier detection and treatment. Among pregnant Peruvian women, a brief screening tool, the GAD-7, has not been validated. This study aims to evaluate the reliability and validity of the GAD-7. METHODS: Of 2,978 women who attended their first perinatal care visit and had the GAD-7 screening, 946 had a Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). The Cronbach's alpha was calculated to examine the reliability. We assessed the criterion validity by calculating operating characteristics. The construct validity was evaluated using factor analysis and association with health status on the CIDI. The cross-cultural validity was explored using the Rasch Rating Scale Model (RSM). RESULTS: The reliability of the GAD-7 was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). A cutoff score of 7 or higher, maximizing the Youden Index, yielded a sensitivity of 73.3% and a specificity of 67.3%. One-factor structure of the GAD-7 was confirmed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was supported by the evidence that higher GAD-7 scores were associated with poor self-rated physical and mental health. The Rasch RSM further confirmed the cross-cultural validity of the GAD-7. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the Spanish-language version of the GAD-7 may be used as a screening tool for pregnant Peruvian women. The GAD-7 has good reliability, factorial validity, and concurrent validity. The optimal cutoff score obtained by maximizing the Youden Index should be considered cautiously; women who screened positive may require further investigation to confirm GAD diagnosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0125096

Cites

74 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener 7-item is considered a reliable screening tool among pregnant Latinas.

    “The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener 7-item (GAD-7; Spitzer et al., 2006) assessed symptoms and severity of generalized anxiety and is considered a reliable screening tool among pregnant Latinas (Zhong et al., 2015).”

    From Exposure Therapy Acceptability Among Pregnant Latinas With Anxiety: A Qualitative Content Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Zhong et al., 2015

    The Discussion reports that the Spanish-language GAD-7 was a reliable screening measure in pregnant Peruvian women assessed during early pregnancy. The claim broadens that finding to pregnant Latinas generally; the paper calls for validation across other regions and Spanish-speaking populations. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhong, Q.-Y., Gelaye, B., Zaslavsky, A. M., Fann, J. R., Rondon, M. B., Sánchez, S. E., & Williams, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Peruvian University of Applied Sciences (PE)
Corresponding author
  • Zhong, Qiu-Yue
  • Gelaye, Bizu
  • Zaslavsky, Alan M.
  • Fann, Jesse R.
  • Sánchez, Sixto E.
  • Williams, Michelle A.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-04-27
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
e0125096
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077680141
Cited by
297
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositorio Académico UPC (Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01-HD)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD059835)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, GAD-7, generalized anxiety disorder, pregnancy, anxiety screening, psychometric validation, Spanish translation, Peruvian women, diagnostic thresholds, Rasch model, cross-cultural validity, factor structure, maternal mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Middle Aged, Peru, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review