The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electronic cigarette use by college students
Open accessAbstract
Background Electronic cigarettes, or ecigarettes, are battery operated devices that deliver nicotine via inhaled vapor. There is considerable controversy about the disease risk and toxicity of ecigarettes and empirical evidence on short- and long-term health effects is minimal. Limited data on e-cigarette use and correlates exist, and to our knowledge, no prevalence rates among U.S. college students have been reported. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of ecigarette use and identify correlates of use among a large, multi-institution, random sample of college students. Methods 4,444 students from 8 colleges in North Carolina completed a Webbased survey in fall 2009. Results Ever use of ecigarettes was reported by 4.9% of students, with 1.5% reporting past month use. Correlates of ever use included male gender, Hispanic or “Other race” (compared to non-Hispanic Whites), Greek affiliation, conventional cigarette smoking and e-cigarette harm perceptions. Although e-cigarette use was more common among conventional cigarette smokers, 12% of ever e-cigarette users had never smoked a conventional cigarette. Among current cigarette smokers, e-cigarette use was negatively associated with lack of knowledge about e-cigarette harm, but was not associated with intentions to quit. Conclusions Although e-cigarette use was more common among conventional cigarette smokers, it was not exclusive to them. E-cigarette use was not associated with intentions to quit smoking among a sub-sample of conventional cigarette smokers. Unlike older, more established cigarette smokers, e-cigarette use by college students does not appear to be motivated by the desire to quit cigarette smoking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,265
Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method
Dillman, D. A. (2007) · Cited by 9,587
Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion
Brown, L. D., Cai, T. T., & DasGupta, A. (2001) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009213286 · Cited by 3,538
Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method
Chisnall, P. M. (2007) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/s0021849907070232 · Cited by 3,219
(1994) · Cited by 2,675
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lazar, N. A. (2003) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2003.s167 · Cited by 2,458
Multiple Imputation of Missing Values
Royston, P. (2004) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0400400301 · Cited by 2,340 · cited 1×
“Analyses for missing data were carried out using multiple imputation methods (Little and Rubin, 2002; Royston, 2004, 2009).”
MethodYouth Risk Behavior Surveillance United States, 2015
Kann, L., McManus, T., Harris, W. A., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., Hawkins, J., Queen, B., Lowry, R., Olsen, E. O., Chyen, D., et al. (2016) · MMWR. Surveillance Summaries · doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6506a1 · Cited by 2,036
Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking
Corr, P. (1995) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(95)90059-4 · Cited by 1,525
The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias: A Meta-Analysis
Groves, R. M., & Peytcheva, E. (2008) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfn011 · Cited by 1,434
Cited by
Hajek, P., Etter, J., Benowitz, N., Eissenberg, T., & McRobbie, H. (2014) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.12659 · Cited by 546
Electronic Cigarettes and Conventional Cigarette Use Among US Adolescents: A Cross-sectional Study
Dutra, L. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2014) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5488 · Cited by 496
Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review
Glasser, A. M., Collins, L., Pearson, J. L., Abudayyeh, H., Niaura, R. S., Abrams, D. B., & Villanti, A. C. (2017) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.036 · Cited by 473
Fadus, M. C., Smith, T. T., & Squeglia, L. M. (2019) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.04.011 · Cited by 429
Carroll Chapman, S. L., & Wu, L.-T. (2014) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.03.005 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Sutfin, E. L., McCoy, T. P., Morrell, H. E. R., Hoeppner, B. B., & Wolfson, M.
- Venue
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 214-221
- ISSN
- 0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034635677
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 29.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electronic cigarette use by college students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.05.001
- The paper
- Sutfin, E. L., McCoy, T. P., Morrell, H. E. R., Hoeppner, B. B., & Wolfson, M. (2013). Electronic cigarette use by college students. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.05.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.