The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Internet and computer based interventions for cannabis use: A meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background Worldwide, cannabis is the most prevalently used illegal drug and creates demand for prevention and treatment services that cannot be fulfilled using conventional approaches. Computer and Internet-based interventions may have the potential to meet this need. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the literature and conducted a meta-analysis on the effectiveness of this approach in reducing the frequency of cannabis use.Methods We systematically searched online databases (Medline, PubMed, PsychINFO, Embase) for eligible studies and conducted a meta-analysis. Studies had to use a randomized design, be delivered either via the Internet or computer and report separate outcomes for cannabis use. The principal outcome measure was the frequency of cannabis use.Results Data were extracted from 10 studies and the meta-analysis involved 10 comparisons with 4,125 participants. The overall effect size was small but significant, g=0.16 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09-0.22, P<0.001) at post-treatment. Subgroup analyses did not reveal significant subgroup differences for key factors including type of analysis (intention-to-treat, completers only), type of control (active, waitlist), age group (11-16, 17+ years), gender composition (female only, mixed), type of intervention (prevention, 'treatment'), guided versus unguided programs, mode of delivery (Internet, computer), individual versus family dyad and venue (home, research setting). Also, no significant moderation effects were found for number of sessions and time to follow-up. Finally, there was no evidence of publication bias.Conclusions Internet and computer interventions appear to be effective in reducing cannabis use in the short-term albeit based on data from few studies and across diverse samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, the participants of these studies have heterogeneous alcohol/drug use and gambling habits; ranging from abstinent, recreational and non-problem users, to those presenting a risk or disorder related to alcohol/drug use or gambling (for example, Tait and Christensen, 2010; Tait et al., 2013).”
From Online and Mobile Interventions for Problem Gambling, Alcohol, and Drugs: A Systematic Review (2017) · cites this paper as Tait et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Psychotherapeutic interventions for cannabis abuse and/or dependence in outpatient settings
Denis, C., Lavie, E., Fatseas, M., & Auriacombe, M. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005336.pub2 · Cited by 108
RetractedDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/springerreference_121117 · Cited by 20,772
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.
Freeman, P. R., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1986) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531069 · Cited by 4,840
Age of onset of mental disorders: a review of recent literature
Kessler, R. C., Amminger, G. P., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alonso, J., Lee, S., & ??st??n, T. B. (2007) · Current Opinion in Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/yco.0b013e32816ebc8c · Cited by 3,457
Eysenbach, G. (2005) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11 · Cited by 2,524
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, 2006, 10.18356/1f8caff1-en · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Telemedicine-delivered treatment interventions for substance use disorders: A systematic review
Lin, L. (., Casteel, D., Shigekawa, E., Weyrich, M. S., Roby, D. H., & McMenamin, S. B. (2019) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2019.03.007 · Cited by 291
Rogers, M. A., Lemmen, K., Kramer, R., Mann, J., & Chopra, V. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7111 · Cited by 259
Sander, L., Rausch, L., & Baumeister, H. (2016) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.6061 · Cited by 218
Carroll, K. M., & Kiluk, B. D. (2017) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0000311 · Cited by 227
Carroll, K. M., Kiluk, B. D., Nich, C., Gordon, M. A., Portnoy, G. A., Marino, D. R., & Ball, S. A. (2014) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13070987 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Tait, R. J., Spijkerman, R., & Riper, H.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- Parnassia Groep (NL)
- Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Tait, Robert J.
- Venue
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 295-304
- ISSN
- 0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059029447
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Keywords
- cannabis use, online intervention, computer-based intervention, digital health interventions, cannabis use frequency, substance use prevention, addiction treatment, intervention effectiveness, adolescents
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Marijuana Abuse, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Microcomputers, Regression Analysis, Publication Bias, Internet, Consumer Health Information
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
