Cited by 177Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDigital Mental Health InterventionsOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Computer-assisted delivery of cognitive-behavioral therapy: Efficacy and durability of CBT4CBT among cocaine-dependent individuals maintained on methadone

Open access
Carroll, Kathleen M., Kiluk, Brian D., Nich, Charla, Gordon, Melissa A., Portnoy, Galina A., Marino, Daniel R., Ball, Samuel A.·2014·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A previous pilot trial evaluating computer-based training for cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT4CBT) in 77 heterogeneous substance users (alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, and opioids) demonstrated preliminary support for its efficacy in the context of a community-based outpatient clinic. The authors conducted a more definitive trial in a larger, more homogeneous sample. METHOD: In this randomized clinical trial, 101 cocaine-dependent individuals maintained on methadone were randomly assigned to standard methadone maintenance or methadone maintenance with weekly access to CBT4CBT, with seven modules delivered within an 8-week trial. RESULTS: Treatment retention and data availability were high and comparable across the treatment conditions. Participants assigned to the CBT4CBT condition were significantly more likely to attain 3 or more consecutive weeks of abstinence from cocaine (36% compared with 17%; p<0.05, odds ratio=0.36). The group assigned to CBT4CBT also had better outcomes on most dimensions, including urine specimens negative for all drugs, but these reached statistical significance only for individuals completing the 8-week trial (N=69). Follow-up data collected 6 months after treatment termination were available for 93% of the randomized sample; these data indicate continued improvement for those assigned to the CBT4CBT group, replicating previous findings regarding its durability. CONCLUSIONS: This trial replicates earlier findings indicating that CBT4CBT is an effective adjunct to addiction treatment with durable effects. CBT4CBT is an easily disseminable strategy for broadening the availability of CBT, even in challenging populations such as cocaine-dependent individuals enrolled in methadone maintenance programs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13070987

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]Roth A Fonagy P What Works for Whom? A Critical Review of the Psychotherapy Literature 2 New York The Guilford Press 2005
  2. [30]First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, Patient Edition Washington, D.C American Psychiatric Press 1995
  3. [35]Singer JD Willett JB Applying Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurence New York Oxford University Press 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carroll, K. M., Kiluk, B. D., Nich, C., Gordon, M. A., Portnoy, G. A., Marino, D. R., & Ball, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • From the Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
Corresponding author
Carroll, Kathleen M.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2014-04
Volume
171
Issue
4
Pages
436-444
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2166556467
Cited by
177
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
13.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R37DA015969, P50DA009241, R01DA015969, P50-DA-0-9241)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
cocaine dependence, methadone maintenance treatment, opioid use disorder, cocaine abstinence, treatment retention, treatment durability, adjunctive psychotherapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Methadone, Middle Aged, Narcotics, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Cocaine-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review