Cited by 24Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Effect of a primary care based brief intervention trial among risky drug users on health-related quality of life

Open access
Baumeister, Sebastian E., Gelberg, Lillian, Leake, Barbara D., Yacenda-Murphy, Julia, Vahidi, Mani, Andersen, Ronald M.·2014·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background Improvement in quality of life (QOL) is a long term goal of drug treatment. Although some brief interventions have been found to reduce illicit drug use, no trial among adult risky (moderate non-dependent) drug users has tested effects on health-related quality of life. Methods A single-blind randomized controlled trial of patients enrolled from February 2011 to November 2012 was conducted in waiting rooms of five federally qualified health centers. 413 adult primary care patients were identified as risky drug users using the WHO-ASSIST and 334 (81% response; 171 intervention, 163 control) consented to participate in the trial. Three-month follow-ups were completed by 261 patients (78%). Intervention patients received the QUIT intervention of brief clinician advice and up to two drug-use health telephone sessions. The control group received usual care and information on cancer screening. Outcomes were three-month changes in the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) mental health component summary score (MCS) and physical health component summary score (PCS). Results The average treatment effect (ATE) was non-significant for MCS (0.2 points, p-value=0.87) and marginally significant for PCS (1.7 points, p-value=0.08). The average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) was 0.1 (p-value=0.93) for MCS and 1.9 (p-value=0.056) for PCS. The effect on PCS was stronger at higher (above median) baseline number of drug use days: ATE=2.7, p-value=0.04; ATT=3.21, p-value=0.02. Conclusions The trial found a marginally significant effect on improvement in PCS, and significant and stronger effect on the SF-12 physical component among patients with greater frequency of initial drug use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.06.034

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a 2014 U.S. RCT among risky drug users, the trial found a marginally significant effect on improvement in PCS, and a significant and stronger effect on SF-12 physical component among patients with greater frequency of initial risky drug use.

    “''The trial found a marginally significant effect on improvement in PCS, and significant and stronger effect on SF-12 physical component among patients with greater frequency of initial [risky] drug use.''”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baumeister, S. E., Gelberg, L., Leake, B. D., Yacenda-Murphy, J., Vahidi, M., & Andersen, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Baumeister, Sebastian E.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
142
Pages
254-261
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969954835
Cited by
24
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Northwestern University
  • National Institutes of Health (4p20md000182-15, 5p20md000148-05)
  • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P30DA027828, R01DA022445, DA027828)
  • National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P20-MD000148, P20-MD000182)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
brief intervention, health-related quality of life, primary care, telephone counseling, physical health, mental health, drug use frequency, federally qualified health centers
MeSH terms
Adult, Counseling, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Quality of Life, Risk-Taking, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Remote Consultation, Drug Users

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review