Cited by 211Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentSmoking Behavior and Cessation

A randomized controlled trial of a brief intervention for illicit drugs linked to the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) in clients recruited from primary health‐care settings in four countries

Humeniuk, Rachel, Ali, Robert, Babor, Thomas, Souza‐Formigoni, Maria Lucia O., de Lacerda, Roseli Boerngen, Ling, Walter, McRee, Bonnie, Newcombe, David +4 more·2012·Addiction

Abstract

AIMS: This study evaluated the effectiveness of a brief intervention (BI) for illicit drugs (cannabis, cocaine, amphetamine-type stimulants and opioids) linked to the World Health Organization (WHO) Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST). The ASSIST screens for problem or risky use of 10 psychoactive substances, producing a score for each substance that falls into either a low-, moderate- or high-risk category. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized controlled trial in which participants were either assigned to a 3-month waiting-list control condition or received brief motivational counselling lasting an average of 13.8 minutes for the drug receiving the highest ASSIST score. SETTING: Primary health-care settings in four countries: Australia, Brazil, India and the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 731 males and females scoring within the moderate-risk range of the ASSIST for cannabis, cocaine, amphetamine-type stimulants or opioids. MEASUREMENTS: ASSIST-specific substance involvement scores for cannabis, stimulants or opioids and ASSIST total illicit substance involvement score at baseline and 3 months post-randomization. FINDINGS: Omnibus analyses indicated that those receiving the BI had significantly reduced scores for all measures, compared with control participants. Country-specific analyses showed that, with the exception of the site in the United States, BI participants had significantly lower ASSIST total illicit substance involvement scores at follow-up compared with the control participants. The sites in India and Brazil demonstrated a very strong brief intervention effect for cannabis scores (P < 0.005 for both sites), as did the sites in Australia (P < 0.005) and Brazil (P < 0.01) for stimulant scores and the Indian site for opioid scores (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test-linked brief intervention aimed at reducing illicit substance use and related risks is effective, at least in the short term, and the effect generalizes across countries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03740.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Humeniuk, R., Ali, R., Babor, T., Souza‐Formigoni, M. L. O., de Lacerda, R. B., Ling, W., McRee, B., Newcombe, D., Pal, H., Poznyak, V., Simon, S., & Vendetti, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Humeniuk, Rachel
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02-28
Volume
107
Issue
5
Pages
957-966
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W1512418458
Cited by
211
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
FWCI
12.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • UNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
brief intervention, motivational counseling, ASSIST, illicit drug use, cannabis, cocaine, amphetamine-type stimulants, opioids, substance use screening, primary care, cross-cultural generalizability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Analysis of Variance, Marijuana Abuse, Counseling, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Opioid-Related Disorders, Prospective Studies, Psychotherapy, Brief, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking, Illicit Drugs, Substance Abuse Detection, Substance-Related Disorders, Cocaine-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review