Mixed-amphetamine salts expectancies among college students: Is stimulant induced cognitive enhancement a placebo effect?
Abstract
Introduction Non-medical use of prescription stimulants for cognitive enhancement in college students is increasing, despite evidence showing little benefit in non-clinical populations. The balanced placebo design (BPD) was used to independently evaluate the pharmacologic versus expectancy effects of mixed amphetamine salts on cognitive performance among a non-clinical sample of college-aged students. Method Participants were screened and excluded for ADHD and other psychopathologies. A non-clinical sample (N=32) completed four two-hour laboratory sessions and were administered a neurocognitive battery in each session. Medication Assignment (10mg mixed-amphetamine salt (Adderall™) versus placebo) was crossed with Instructional Set (deception versus truth). A within-subjects design was used, such that all participants experienced each of the four conditions of the BPD during one of the four laboratory sessions. Results Participants performed no better than chance in identifying whether they received stimulant or placebo (Belief about Medication Assignment; 47% agreement; κ=-0.047, p=0.590). Participants showed improvement on only two of 31 subtests during active medication. Expecting and receiving stimulants was associated with improved cognitive performance. However, expecting placebo was associated with worse cognitive performance, regardless of the type of medication given. Discussion This study demonstrated that although non-medical use of stimulants does not enhance cogni…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
College students without ADHD are likely to experience little to no benefit from taking stimulant medication because there is no dopamine deficit to correct.
“College students without ADHD, however, are likely to experience little to no benefit from taking stimulant medication because there is no dopamine deficit to correct (e.g., Cropsey et al., 2017).”
From Effects of stimulant medication on neuropsychological functioning in college students without ADHD. (2026) · cites this paper as Cropsey et al., 2017
Six prior studies have largely found no evidence of meaningful neuropsychological improvement in students without ADHD who ingest a stimulant medication, including no improvements for working memory, response inhibition, vigilance, cognitive processing speed, planning, set-shifting, interference control, and distraction suppression.
“Six studies have largely found no evidence of meaningful neuropsychological improvement in students without ADHD who ingest a stimulant medication.”
From Effects of stimulant medication on neuropsychological functioning in college students without ADHD. (2026) · cites this paper as Cropsey et al., 2017
Cites
Distributed Neural Representation of Expected Value
Knutson, B., Taylor, J., Kaufman, M., Peterson, R., & Glover, G. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0642-05.2005 · Cited by 955 · see citing works
Swanson, J. M., Kinsbourne, M., Nigg, J., Lanphear, B., Stefanatos, G. A., Volkow, N., Taylor, E., Casey, B. J., Castellanos, F. X., & Wadhwa, P. D. (2007) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-007-9019-9 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Advokat, C. (2010) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.03.006 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
van Rooij, D., Hoekstra, P. J., Mennes, M., von Rhein, D., Thissen, A. J. A. M., Heslenfeld, D., Zwiers, M. P., Faraone, S. V., Oosterlaan, J., Franke, B., et al. (2015) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13121635 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effects of stimulant medication on neuropsychological functioning in college students without ADHD.
Vasko, J. M., Looby, A., Serrano, J. W., Abu-Ramadan, T. M., Miller, E. A., McGee, N., Smith, D. T., & Hartung, C. M. (2026) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/pha0000853
- Authors
- Cropsey, K. L., Schiavon, S., Hendricks, P. S., Froelich, M., Lentowicz, I., & Fargason, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cropsey, Karen L.
- Venue
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 178
- Pages
- 302-309
- ISSN
- 0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2691525845
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Alabama
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Keywords
- mixed amphetamine salts, Adderall, cognitive enhancement, placebo effect, expectancy effects, university students, deception, neuropsychological performance
- MeSH terms
- Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cognition, Humans, Students, Placebo Effect, Nootropic Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review