Cited by 39Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsPain Management and Placebo EffectAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Mixed-amphetamine salts expectancies among college students: Is stimulant induced cognitive enhancement a placebo effect?

Cropsey, Karen L., Schiavon, Samantha, Hendricks, Peter S., Froelich, Morgan, Lentowicz, Iga, Fargason, Rachel·2017·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Introduction Non-medical use of prescription stimulants for cognitive enhancement in college students is increasing, despite evidence showing little benefit in non-clinical populations. The balanced placebo design (BPD) was used to independently evaluate the pharmacologic versus expectancy effects of mixed amphetamine salts on cognitive performance among a non-clinical sample of college-aged students. Method Participants were screened and excluded for ADHD and other psychopathologies. A non-clinical sample (N=32) completed four two-hour laboratory sessions and were administered a neurocognitive battery in each session. Medication Assignment (10mg mixed-amphetamine salt (Adderall™) versus placebo) was crossed with Instructional Set (deception versus truth). A within-subjects design was used, such that all participants experienced each of the four conditions of the BPD during one of the four laboratory sessions. Results Participants performed no better than chance in identifying whether they received stimulant or placebo (Belief about Medication Assignment; 47% agreement; κ=-0.047, p=0.590). Participants showed improvement on only two of 31 subtests during active medication. Expecting and receiving stimulants was associated with improved cognitive performance. However, expecting placebo was associated with worse cognitive performance, regardless of the type of medication given. Discussion This study demonstrated that although non-medical use of stimulants does not enhance cogni…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.024

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • College students without ADHD are likely to experience little to no benefit from taking stimulant medication because there is no dopamine deficit to correct.

    “College students without ADHD, however, are likely to experience little to no benefit from taking stimulant medication because there is no dopamine deficit to correct (e.g., Cropsey et al., 2017).”
  • Six prior studies have largely found no evidence of meaningful neuropsychological improvement in students without ADHD who ingest a stimulant medication, including no improvements for working memory, response inhibition, vigilance, cognitive processing speed, planning, set-shifting, interference control, and distraction suppression.

    “Six studies have largely found no evidence of meaningful neuropsychological improvement in students without ADHD who ingest a stimulant medication.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cropsey, K. L., Schiavon, S., Hendricks, P. S., Froelich, M., Lentowicz, I., & Fargason, R.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Cropsey, Karen L.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
178
Pages
302-309
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2691525845
Cited by
39
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Alabama
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Keywords
mixed amphetamine salts, Adderall, cognitive enhancement, placebo effect, expectancy effects, university students, deception, neuropsychological performance
MeSH terms
Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cognition, Humans, Students, Placebo Effect, Nootropic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review