Cited by 1,035Barrier Structure and Function StudiesGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

Overcoming the blood–brain tumor barrier for effective glioblastoma treatment

van Tellingen, O., Yetkin-Arik, B., de Gooijer, M.C., Wesseling, P., Wurdinger, T., de Vries, H.E.·2015·Drug Resistance Updates

Abstract

Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors. Particularly in adult patients, the vast majority of gliomas belongs to the heterogeneous group of diffuse gliomas, i.e. glial tumors characterized by diffuse infiltrative growth in the preexistent brain tissue. Unfortunately, glioblastoma, the most aggressive (WHO grade IV) diffuse glioma is also by far the most frequent one. After standard treatment, the 2-year overall survival of glioblastoma patients is approximately only 25%. Advanced knowledge in the molecular pathology underlying malignant transformation has offered new handles and better treatments for several cancer types. Unfortunately, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients have not yet profited as although numerous experimental drugs have been tested in clinical trials, all failed miserably. This grim prognosis for GBM is at least partly due to the lack of successful drug delivery across the blood-brain tumor barrier (BBTB). The human brain comprises over 100 billion capillaries with a total length of 400 miles, a total surface area of 20 m(2) and a median inter-capillary distance of about 50 μm, making it the best perfused organ in the body. The BBTB encompasses existing and newly formed blood vessels that contribute to the delivery of nutrients and oxygen to the tumor and facilitate glioma cell migration to other parts of the brain. The high metabolic demands of high-grade glioma create hypoxic areas that trigger increased expression of VEGF and angiogenesis, lea…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drup.2015.02.002

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Tellingen, O., Yetkin-Arik, B., de Gooijer, M. C., Wesseling, P., Wurdinger, T., & de Vries, H. E.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Drug Resistance Updates
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
19
Pages
1-12
ISSN
1368-7646 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966720603
Cited by
1,035
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 133 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 17
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug Resistance Updates (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Dutch Organization of Scientific Research
  • European Research Council Starting Researchers Grant
  • Stichting Stophersentumoren.nl
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
glioblastoma, blood-brain tumor barrier, drug delivery, blood-brain barrier disruption, bradykinin receptor antagonists
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain Neoplasms, Glioblastoma, Humans, Prognosis, Drug Design, Drug Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review