Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential associations between smoking, e-cigarette use, and diabetes prevalence

Adebisi, Yusuff Adebayo, Ngoma, Chimwemwe, Campagna, Davide, Ceriello, Antonio, Alshahrani, Najim Z., Misra, Anoop, Basit, Abdul, Russo, Cristina, Battelino, Tadej, Somasundaram, Noel, Jalaludin, Muhammad Yazid, Le Dinh, Phuong, Saisho, Yoshifumi, Walicka, Magdalena, Tomaselli, Venera, Cantone, Giulio, Moser, Othmar, Polosa, Riccardo·2025·Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking is a well-established risk factor for diabetes, but the relationship between e-cigarette use and diabetes remains uncertain. Evidence to date has been drawn almost entirely from North America and Asia, with little information from European populations. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 17,854 adults aged 16 years and older from the 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021 waves of the nationally representative Scottish Health Survey. Diabetes status was based on self-report of doctor-diagnosed diabetes. Participants were classified into six mutually exclusive categories of smoking and e-cigarette use: never users of either cigarettes or e-cigarettes, ex-smokers (former smokers who never used e-cigarettes), current exclusive cigarette smokers, current exclusive e-cigarette users, current dual users, and former e-cigarette users. Weighted prevalence estimates and survey-weighted binary logistic regression models were used to examine associations, adjusting for age group, sex, education, deprivation quintile, ethnicity, alcohol use, physical activity, and hypertension. RESULTS: Diabetes prevalence was highest among ex-smokers (11.3 %, 95 % CI: 10.1-12.5). Prevalence was 5.7 % (95 % CI: 5.2-6.2) among never users of either cigarettes or e-cigarettes, 6.2 % (95 % CI: 4.9-7.9) among current exclusive cigarette smokers, 4.9 % (95 % CI: 3.4-7.1) among current exclusive e-cigarette users, 8.3 % (95 % CI: 5.8-11.8) among current dual users, and 5.1 % (95 % CI: 4.1-6.3) among former e-cigarette users. In adjusted models, ex-smokers had 35 % higher odds of diabetes compared with never users of either cigarettes or e-cigarettes (OR = 1.35, 95 % CI = 1.14-1.60, p < 0.001), whereas current exclusive smokers (OR = 0.78, 95 % CI = 0.58-1.03, p = 0.084), current exclusive e-cigarette users (OR = 0.81, 95 % CI = 0.53-1.22, p = 0.309), current dual users (OR = 1.49, 95 % CI = 0.94-2.38, p = 0.091), and former e-cigarette users (OR = 1.00, 95 % CI = 0.78-1.29, p = 0.973) were not significantly different from never users. Sensitivity analyses restricting ex-smokers to those with ≥5 years since cessation and limiting the sample to adults aged ≥45 years reproduced the same pattern of results. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationally representative study of Scottish adults, excess diabetes prevalence was observed among ex-smokers, a pattern that may reflect both reverse causation if individuals quit smoking after diagnosis and the lasting metabolic effects of cumulative smoking exposure. Neither current nor former e-cigarette use was associated with diabetes, and the observed variation in prevalence appeared linked to smoking history rather than e-cigarette use. However, because vaping is relatively recent, further longitudinal research is needed to clarify any long-term risks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dsx.2025.103331

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Cao, 2024, An overview of environmental risk factors for type 2 diabetes research using network science tools, Digit Health, 10
  2. Collier, 2017, E-cigs have lower levels of harmful toxins, CMAJ (Can Med Assoc J), 189
  3. Klonizakis, 2021, Short-Term cardiovascular effects of E-Cigarettes in adults making a stop-smoking attempt: a randomized controlled trial, Biology, 10, 1208, 10.3390/biology10111208 · DOI
  4. Neupane, 2024, Heterogeneous Association between E-Cigarette use and diabetes prevalence among U.S. adults, AJ Focus, 4
  5. Lim, 2024, Association between E-Cigarette smoking and insulin resistance using the triglyceride-glucose index in Korean adults: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Korean J Fam Med, 20
  6. Adebisi, 2025, 'E-cigarette smoking' is a misleading term: a critical review of its use in academic literature, Intern Emerg Med, 18
  7. Adebisi, 2025, Who does not want to quit? Determinants of no intention to stop smoking in a population-based sample of current smokers, Intern Emerg Med, 4

Metadata

Authors
Adebisi, Y. A., Ngoma, C., Campagna, D., Ceriello, A., Alshahrani, N. Z., Misra, A., Basit, A., Russo, C., Battelino, T., Somasundaram, N., Jalaludin, M. Y., Le Dinh, P., Saisho, Y., Walicka, M., Tomaselli, V., Cantone, G., Moser, O., & Polosa, R.
Venue
Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-10
Volume
19
Issue
10
Pages
103331
ISSN
1871-4021
Cited by
8
References
38
Language
en
Licence
Funders
University of Glasgow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential associations between smoking, e-cigarette use, and diabetes prevalence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.dsx.2025.103331
The paper
Adebisi, Y. A., Ngoma, C., Campagna, D., Ceriello, A., Alshahrani, N. Z., Misra, A., Basit, A., Russo, C., Battelino, T., Somasundaram, N., Jalaludin, M. Y., Le Dinh, P., Saisho, Y., Walicka, M., Tomaselli, V., Cantone, G., Moser, O., & Polosa, R. (2025). Differential associations between smoking, e-cigarette use, and diabetes prevalence. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2025.103331

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.