The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relation of active, passive, and quitting smoking with incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background Cigarette smoking remains the leading avoidable cause of disease burden worldwide, and observational studies have linked various smoking behaviors (active and passive smoking and smoking cessation) with risk of type 2 diabetes. We did a meta-analysis of prospective studies assessing the relation of various smoking behaviors and diabetes risk. Methods We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (up to 3 May 2015) with manual searches of the references of retrieved publications and relevant reviews. We included prospective studies that reported risk of type 2 diabetes by baseline smoking status. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models, and subgroup analyses were performed by participant and study characteristics. Findings The search yielded 88 prospective studies with nearly 6 million participants and 295446 incident cases. Compared with never smoking, the pooled RR (95% CI) of type 2 diabetes was 1·37 (1·33-1·42) for current smoking (84 studies), 1·14 (1·10-1·18) for former smoking (47 studies), and 1·22 (1·10-1·35) for passive smoking (7 studies). The associations persisted in all subgroups, and a dose-response relation was found for current smoking and diabetes risk: the RRs (95% CIs) were 1·21 (1·10-1·33), 1·34 (1·27-1·41) and 1·57 (1·47-1·66) for light, moderate, and heavy smokers, respectively, compared with never smokers. We estimated that 10·3% in men and 2·2% in women of type 2 diabetes cases (approximately 25 million) were attributable to cigarette smoking worldwide if smoking is causally related to diabetes. Compared to never smokers, the pooled RR (95% CI) from 10 studies was 1·54 (1·36-1·74) in new quitters (<5 years), and 1·11 (1·02-1·20) in long-term quitters (≥10 years). Interpretation Active and passive smoking are associated with significantly increased risks of type 2 diabetes. The risk of diabetes is elevated in new quitters, but decreases substantially as the time since quitting increases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · Cited by 19,575
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Sterne, J. A. C., Sutton, A. J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Terrin, N., Jones, D. R., Lau, J., Carpenter, J., Rucker, G., Harbord, R. M., Schmid, C. H., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d4002 · Cited by 7,709
Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses
Riley, R. D., Higgins, J. P. T., & Deeks, J. J. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d549 · Cited by 2,884
Öberg, M., Jaakkola, M. S., Woodward, A., Peruga, A., & Prüss-Ustün, A. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61388-8 · Cited by 1,939
Cited by
2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice
Piepoli, M. F., Hoes, A. W., Agewall, S., Albus, C., Brotons, C., Catapano, A. L., Cooney, M.-T., Corrà, U., Cosyns, B., Deaton, C., et al. (2016) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106 · Cited by 6,457
Sex and Gender Differences in Risk, Pathophysiology and Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Kautzky-Willer, A., Harreiter, J., & Pacini, G. (2016) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2015-1137 · Cited by 2,043
Impact of Healthy Lifestyle Factors on Life Expectancies in the US Population
Li, Y., Pan, A., Wang, D. D., Liu, X., Dhana, K., Franco, O. H., Kaptoge, S., Di Angelantonio, E., Stampfer, M., Willett, W. C., et al. (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.117.032047 · Cited by 927
Self-citationKinoshita, M., Yokote, K., Arai, H., Iida, M., Ishigaki, Y., Ishibashi, S., Umemoto, S., Egusa, G., Ohmura, H., Okamura, T., et al. (2018) · Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis · doi:10.5551/jat.gl2017 · Cited by 813
Risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus: An exposure-wide umbrella review of meta-analyses
Bellou, V., Belbasis, L., Tzoulaki, I., & Evangelou, E. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194127 · Cited by 713
Metadata
- Authors
- Pan, A., Wang, Y., Talaei, M., Hu, F. B., & Wu, T.
- Venue
- The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 958-967
- ISSN
- 2213-8587 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1853794616
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 5.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relation of active, passive, and quitting smoking with incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s2213-8587(15)00316-2
- The paper
- Pan, A., Wang, Y., Talaei, M., Hu, F. B., & Wu, T. (2015). Relation of active, passive, and quitting smoking with incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(15)00316-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.