Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 551

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relation of active, passive, and quitting smoking with incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Pan, An, Wang, Yeli, Talaei, Mohammad, Hu, Frank B, Wu, Tangchun·2015·The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology

Abstract

Background Cigarette smoking remains the leading avoidable cause of disease burden worldwide, and observational studies have linked various smoking behaviors (active and passive smoking and smoking cessation) with risk of type 2 diabetes. We did a meta-analysis of prospective studies assessing the relation of various smoking behaviors and diabetes risk. Methods We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (up to 3 May 2015) with manual searches of the references of retrieved publications and relevant reviews. We included prospective studies that reported risk of type 2 diabetes by baseline smoking status. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models, and subgroup analyses were performed by participant and study characteristics. Findings The search yielded 88 prospective studies with nearly 6 million participants and 295446 incident cases. Compared with never smoking, the pooled RR (95% CI) of type 2 diabetes was 1·37 (1·33-1·42) for current smoking (84 studies), 1·14 (1·10-1·18) for former smoking (47 studies), and 1·22 (1·10-1·35) for passive smoking (7 studies). The associations persisted in all subgroups, and a dose-response relation was found for current smoking and diabetes risk: the RRs (95% CIs) were 1·21 (1·10-1·33), 1·34 (1·27-1·41) and 1·57 (1·47-1·66) for light, moderate, and heavy smokers, respectively, compared with never smokers. We estimated that 10·3% in men and 2·2% in women of type 2 diabetes cases (approximately 25 million) were attributable to cigarette smoking worldwide if smoking is causally related to diabetes. Compared to never smokers, the pooled RR (95% CI) from 10 studies was 1·54 (1·36-1·74) in new quitters (<5 years), and 1·11 (1·02-1·20) in long-term quitters (≥10 years). Interpretation Active and passive smoking are associated with significantly increased risks of type 2 diabetes. The risk of diabetes is elevated in new quitters, but decreases substantially as the time since quitting increases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2213-8587(15)00316-2

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 551

Metadata

Authors
Pan, A., Wang, Y., Talaei, M., Hu, F. B., & Wu, T.
Venue
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
3
Issue
12
Pages
958-967
ISSN
2213-8587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1853794616
Cited by
551
References
26
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relation of active, passive, and quitting smoking with incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s2213-8587(15)00316-2
The paper
Pan, A., Wang, Y., Talaei, M., Hu, F. B., & Wu, T. (2015). Relation of active, passive, and quitting smoking with incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(15)00316-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.