CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is smoking in pregnancy an independent predictor of academic difficulties at 14years of age? A birth cohort study

O'Callaghan, Frances V., Al Mamun, Abdullah, O'Callaghan, Michael, Alati, Rosa, Williams, Gail M., Najman, Jake M.·2010·Early Human Development
DOI 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.12.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Studies of the effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy have reported inconsistent findings in relation to measures of offspring cognitive functioning. Few studies, however, have examined learning outcomes in adolescents, as opposed to IQ. Aim To examine the association between maternal smoking during pregnancy and academic performance among adolescent offspring. Study design Population-based birth cohort study. Subjects 7223 mothers and children were enrolled in the Mater-University of Queensland Study of Pregnancy in Brisbane (Australia) from 1981 to 1984. Analyses were restricted to the 4294 mothers and children for whom all information was reported at 14-year follow-up. Outcome measures Reports of academic performance of 14-year-old offspring in English, Science and Mathematics with different patterns of maternal smoking (never smoked, smoked before and/or after pregnancy but not during pregnancy, or smoked during pregnancy). Results Low academic achievement was more common only in those whose mothers had smoked during pregnancy. Effect sizes were, however, small. The adjusted mean difference in total learning score for smoking before and/or after pregnancy but not during pregnancy, and for smoking during pregnancy were -0.18 (-0.58, 0.22) and -0.40 (-0.69, -0.12). Similarly, the adjusted odds ratios were 0.9 (0. 65, 1.24) and 1.35 (1.07, 1.70). Conclusion Maternal smoking during pregnancy is a preventable prenatal risk factor associated with small decremen…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.12.008

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Lassen, 1998, Effects of maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy on long-term physical and cognitive parameters of child development, Addict Behav, 23, 635, 10.1016/S0306-4603(98)00022-7 · DOI
  2. Lawlor, 2006, Early life predictors of childhood intelligence: findings from the Mater-University study of pregnancy and its outcomes, Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 20, 148, 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00704.x · DOI
  3. Batty, 2006, Effect of maternal smoking during pregnancy on offspring's cognitive ability: empirical evidence for complete confounding in the US National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, Pediatrics, 118, 943, 10.1542/peds.2006-0168 · DOI
  4. Breslau, 2005, Maternal smoking during pregnancy and offspring IQ, Int J Epidemiol, 34, 1047, 10.1093/ije/dyi163 · DOI
  5. Fergusson, 1991, Smoking during pregnancy and its effects on child cognitive ability from the ages of 8 to 12years, Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 5, 189, 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1991.tb00700.x · DOI
  6. Julvez, 2007, Maternal smoking habits and cognitive development of children at age 4years in a population-based birth cohort, Int J Epidemiol, 36, 825, 10.1093/ije/dym107 · DOI
  7. Bauman, 1991, Parental cigarette smoking and cognitive performance of children, Health Psychol, 10, 282, 10.1037/0278-6133.10.4.282 · DOI
  8. Furnham, 2003, Personality predicts academic performance: evidence from two longitudinal university samples, J Res Pers, 37, 319, 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00578-0 · DOI
  9. Colom, 2007, Fluid intelligence, memory span, and temperament difficulties predict academic performance of young adolescents, Pers Individ Dif, 42, 1503, 10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.023 · DOI
  10. Rantakallio, 1983, A follow-up study to the age of 14 of children whose mothers smoked during pregnancy, Acta Paediatr Scand, 72, 747, 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1983.tb09805.x · DOI
  11. Fogelman, 1980, Smoking in pregnancy and subsequent development of the child, Child Care Health Dev, 6, 223, 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1980.tb00154.x · DOI
  12. Batstra, 2003, Effect of antenatal exposure to maternal smoking on behavioural problems and academic achievement in childhood: prospective evidence from a Dutch birth cohort, Early Hum Dev, 75, 21, 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2003.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Martin, 2006, Smoking during pregnancy: association with childhood temperament, behaviour, and academic performance, J Pediatr Psychol, 31, 490, 10.1093/jpepsy/jsj041 · DOI
  14. Lambe, 2006, Maternal smoking during pregnancy and school performance at age 15, Epidemiol, 17, 524, 10.1097/01.ede.0000231561.49208.be · DOI · Paper page
  15. Fried, 2003, Differential effects on cognitive functioning in 13- to 16-year-olds prenatally exposed to cigarettes and marihuana, Neurotoxicol Teratol, 25, 427, 10.1016/S0892-0362(03)00029-1 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Najman, 2005, Cohort profile: the Mater-University of Queensland Study of Pregnancy (MUSP), Int J Epidemiol, 34, 992, 10.1093/ije/dyi119 · DOI
  17. Lawlor, 2004, Associations of parental, birth and early life characteristics with systolic blood pressure at age 5: findings from the Mater-University study of pregnancy and its outcomes, Circulation, 110, 2417, 10.1161/01.CIR.0000145165.80130.B5 · DOI
  18. Keeping, 1989, A prospective longitudinal study of social, psychological and obstetric factors in pregnancy: response rates and demographic characteristics of the 8556 respondents, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 96, 289, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb02388.x · DOI
  19. Cole, 1997, A competency-based model of child depression: a longitudinal study of peer, parent, teacher, and self-evaluations, J Child Psychol Psych, 38, 505, 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01537.x · DOI
  20. Cole, 2001, Social origins of depressive cognitions: a longitudinal study of self-perceived competence in children, Cognitive Ther Res, 25, 377, 10.1023/A:1005582419077 · DOI
  21. Spanier, 1976, Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads, J Marriage Fam, 38, 15, 10.2307/350547 · DOI
  22. Barnes, 1985, Parent–adolescent communication and the circumplex model, Child Dev, 56, 438, 10.2307/1129732 · DOI
  23. Achenbach, 1981, Behavioural problems and competencies reported by parents of normal and disturbed children aged four through sixteen, Monogr Soc Res Child Dev, 46, 1, 10.2307/1165983 · DOI
  24. Najman, 1997, Impact of family type and family quality on child behaviour problems: a longitudinal study, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psych, 36, 1357, 10.1097/00004583-199710000-00017 · DOI
  25. Maguin, 1996, How well do ratings of academic performance by mothers and their sons correspond to grades, achievement test scores, and teachers' ratings?, J Beh Educ, 6, 405, 10.1007/BF02110514 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
O'Callaghan, F. V., Al Mamun, A., O'Callaghan, M., Alati, R., Williams, G. M., & Najman, J. M.
Venue
Early Human Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
86
Issue
2
Pages
71-76
ISSN
0378-3782
DOI
10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.12.008
Cited by
30
References
5
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review