Cited by 124Prenatal Substance Exposure EffectsSmoking Behavior and CessationInfant Development and Preterm Care

Maternal smoking during pregnancy and school performance at age 15

Lambe, Mats, Hultman, Christina, Torr??ng, Anna, MacCabe, James, Cnattingius, Sven·2006·Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smoking during pregnancy has been suggested to have long-term consequences for neuropsychologic development in the offspring, including behavioral problems, attention deficit disorders, and antisocial behavior. Also, findings from several studies indicate an association with impaired cognitive function in the children. METHODS: In a population-based Swedish cohort study, we examined possible associations between maternal smoking in pregnancy and educational achievement in the offspring at age 15 years among more than 400,000 male and female students born 1983 through 1987. Generalized estimating equation models were used to evaluate associations of maternal smoking, other maternal characteristics, and birth characteristics with school performance. Odds ratios (ORs) were used as a measure of risk. RESULTS: In a model adjusted for maternal characteristics, maternal smoking compared with no tobacco use during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of poor scholastic achievement: for 1-9 cigarettes per day, the OR was 1.59 (95% confidence interval = 1.59-1.63) and for 10 or more cigarettes per day, the OR was 1.92 (1.86-1.98). These risks remained unchanged when we also adjusted for smoking-related pregnancy outcomes such as fetal growth restriction and preterm birth. However, if the mother had smoked in her first pregnancy, but not in her second pregnancy, the younger sibling was also at increased risk of poor school performance. CONCLUSION: Observed associations between maternal smoking during pregnancy and poor cognitive performance in the offspring might not be causal. We suggest that associations reported in earlier studies may instead reflect the influence of unmeasured characteristics that differ between smokers and nonsmokers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ede.0000231561.49208.be

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lambe, M., Hultman, C., Torr??ng, A., MacCabe, J., & Cnattingius, S.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Lambe, Mats
  • Hultman, Christina
  • Cnattingius, Sven
Venue
Epidemiology
Published
2006-09
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
524-530
ISSN
1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979267538
Cited by
124
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
smoking during pregnancy, academic performance, offspring cognitive development, prenatal tobacco exposure, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth, sibling comparison, birth cohort
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cognition Disorders, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Smoking, Socioeconomic Factors, Sweden, Cohort Studies, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review