Cited by 18Infant Health and DevelopmentSleep and related disordersChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Comparison of two strategies to improve infant sleep problems, and associated impacts on maternal experience, mood and infant emotional health: A single case replication design study

Matthey, Stephen, Črnčec, Rudi·2012·Early Human Development

Abstract

Background Infant sleep problems (ISP) are common and have known effects on parental mood. There is debate as to whether treatment strategies may impact on the infant's emotional health.Aims To compare the effectiveness of two treatment strategies for ISP on the infant's sleep, maternal mood, and the infant's emotional health. The two strategies are 1) systematic ignoring with minimal check ('SI-mc': commonly known as 'controlled crying'), and 2) a new, but similar, method where parents feign sleep inside the infant's room before intervening (parental presence with minimal check: 'PP-mc').Design Participants were randomised to one of the two conditions. Measures were taken at baseline, then three weeks and four months post-intervention.Subjects Data were collected from 16 families with infants aged 6-18 months who were seeking professional help with their infant's sleep difficulties.Outcome measures Measures of infant sleep, maternal experiences and mood, and infant emotional health were collected.Results Both treatments were effective, with a third to a half of families reporting decreased ISP by 3 week post intervention, and nearly all reporting decreased ISP by follow-up. Similarly, most mothers in both treatments reported improvements to their experiences or mood, and there was no discernable disruption to infant emotional health.Conclusions These findings support previous research into the effectiveness of SI-mc. The study also expands the research into the effectiveness of parental presence by showing that with the inclusion of the minimal check component, which may be preferred by both parents and clinicians over non-responding to the crying infant, the strategy is as effective as SI-mc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.10.010

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matthey, S., & Črnčec, R.
Affiliations
  • South Western Sydney Local Health District (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Early Human Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
88
Issue
6
Pages
437-442
ISSN
0378-3782 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123942603
Cited by
18
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Early Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Western Sydney
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
infant sleep problems, parental presence, infant crying, maternal mood, maternal experience, sleep interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Affective Symptoms, Anxiety Disorders, Child Rearing, Emotions, Female, Humans, Infant, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Mental Health, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Infant Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review