Cited by 46Bone health and osteoporosis researchPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsBone Metabolism and Diseases

Pituitary Diseases and Bone

Mazziotti, Gherardo, Chiavistelli, Silvia, Giustina, Andrea·2015·Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America

Abstract

Pituitary hormones have direct and indirect effects on bone remodeling, and skeletal fragility is a frequent complication of pituitary diseases. Fragility fractures may occur in many patients with prolactinomas, acromegaly, Cushing disease, and hypopituitarism. As in other forms of secondary osteoporosis, pituitary diseases generally affect bone quality more than bone quantity, and fractures may occur even in the presence of normal or low-normal bone mineral density, making difficult the prediction of fractures in these settings. Treatment of excess and defective pituitary hormone generally improves skeletal health, although some patients remain at high risk for fractures, necessitating treatment with bone-active drugs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecl.2014.10.014

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pituitary diseases generally affect bone quality more than bone quantity.

    “pituitary diseases generally affect bone quality more than bone quantity”

    From Pituitary Diseases and Bone (2018) · cites this paper as [1]

  • Fractures may occur even in the presence of normal or low-normal bone mineral density as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, making prediction of fractures difficult.

    “fractures may occur even in the presence of normal or lownormal bone mineral density as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, making difficult the prediction of fractures in these clinical settings.”

    From Pituitary Diseases and Bone (2018) · cites this paper as [1]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mazziotti, G., Chiavistelli, S., & Giustina, A.
Affiliations
University of Brescia (IT)
Corresponding author
Giustina, Andrea
Venue
Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
171-180
ISSN
0889-8529 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052251143
Cited by
46
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
Keywords
pituitary disorders, bone remodeling, fragility fractures, secondary osteoporosis, prolactinoma, acromegaly, Cushing's disease, hypopituitarism, bone mineral density, bone quality, fracture risk prediction
MeSH terms
Bone Diseases, Humans, Pituitary Diseases, Fractures, Bone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review