The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-Fidelity Simulation in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Review of Simulation Reviews
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Simulation education offers the advantage of experiencing interactive scenarios with patients and healthcare professionals based on real-life situations [8].”
From Development and effects of a chatbot education program for self-directed learning in nursing students (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
The integrative review: updated methodology
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x · Cited by 10,241
Educational Research: An Introduction
Dale, R. R., & Borg, W. R. (1965) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119062 · Cited by 7,218
Educational Research: An Introduction
Gall, G. A. (2003) · Cited by 1,661
Simulation‐based learning in nurse education: systematic review
Cant, R. P., & Cooper, S. J. (2010) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05240.x · Cited by 984
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Vrabel, M. (2015) · Oncology Nursing Forum · doi:10.1188/15.onf.552-554 · Cited by 669
Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: Meta-analysis
Shin, S., Park, J.-H., & Kim, J.-H. (2015) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.09.009 · Cited by 543
A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation debriefing in health professional education
Levett-Jones, T. L., & Lapkin, S. (2013) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.09.020 · Cited by 434
Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Standard I: Terminology
Meakim, C. H., Boese, T., Decker, S., Franklin, A. E., Gloe, D. S., Lioce, L., Sando, C. R., & Borum, J. C. (2013) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.001 · Cited by 349
Evaluation of Simulation in Undergraduate Nurse Education: An Integrative Review
Foronda, C. L., Liu, S., & Bauman, E. B. (2013) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2012.11.003 · Cited by 241
High-Fidelity Simulation Debriefing in Nursing Education: A Literature Review
Neill, M. A., & Wotton, K. (2011) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2011.02.001 · Cited by 215
Successful debriefing — Best methods to achieve positive learning outcomes: A literature review
Dufrene, C., & Young, A. (2013) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.06.026 · Cited by 188
High-Fidelity Patient Simulation in Nursing Education:An Integrative Review
WEAVER, A. (2011) · Nursing Education Perspectives · doi:10.5480/1536-5026-32.1.37 · Cited by 177
Yuan, H. B., Williams, B. A., Fang, J. B., & Ye, Q. H. (2011) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.07.010 · Cited by 157
Yuan, H. B., Williams, B. A., & Fang, J. B. (2011) · International Nursing Review · doi:10.1111/j.1466-7657.2011.00964.x · Cited by 154
Fisher, D., & King, L. (2013) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12174 · Cited by 128
Use of Prebriefing in Nursing Simulation: A Literature Review
Page-Cutrara, K. (2014) · Journal of Nursing Education · doi:10.3928/01484834-20140211-07 · Cited by 104
Simulation in Nursing Education: Current Regulations and Practices
Hayden, J. K., Smiley, R. A., & Gross, L. (2014) · Journal of Nursing Regulation · doi:10.1016/s2155-8256(15)30084-3 · Cited by 84
Human Patient Simulation: State of the Science in Prelicensure Nursing Education
Shinnick, M. A., Woo, M. A., & Mentes, J. C. (2011) · Journal of Nursing Education · doi:10.3928/01484834-20101230-01 · Cited by 72
High-Fidelity Simulation and Safety: An Integrative Review
Shearer, J. E. (2012) · Journal of Nursing Education · doi:10.3928/01484834-20121121-01 · Cited by 68
Blum, C. A., & Parcells, D. A. (2012) · Journal of Nursing Education · doi:10.3928/01484834-20120523-01 · Cited by 51
Patient safety and simulation in prelicensure nursing education: An integrative review
Berndt, J. (2013) · Teaching and learning in nursing · doi:10.1016/j.teln.2013.09.001 · Cited by 46
Use of High-Fidelity Simulation for Staff Education/Development
Hallenbeck, V. J. (2012) · Journal for Nurses in Staff Development · doi:10.1097/nnd.0b013e31827259c7 · Cited by 42
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- International Nursing Association of Clinical Simulation and Learning Standards Committee, 2013, Standards of best practice in simulation I-IX, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9, S1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
High-fidelity simulation and nursing students’ anxiety and self-confidence: A systematic review
Labrague, L. J., McEnroe–Petitte, D. M., Bowling, A. M., Nwafor, C. E., & Tsaras, K. (2019) · Nursing Forum · doi:10.1111/nuf.12337 · Cited by 217
High-fidelity simulation in undergraduate nursing education: A meta-analysis
Li, Y. Y., Au, M. L., Tong, L. K., Ng, W. I., & Wang, S. C. (2022) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105291 · Cited by 142
Cantrell, M. A., Franklin, A. E., Leighton, K., & Carlson, A. (2017) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2017.08.004 · Cited by 128
The Role of High-Fidelity Team-Based Simulation in Acute Care Settings: A Systematic Review
Armenia, S. J., Thangamathesvaran, L., Caine, A. D., King, N., Kunac, A., & Merchant, A. M. (2018) · The Surgery Journal · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1667315 · Cited by 111
Interprofessional simulation in undergraduate nursing program: An integrative review
Labrague, L. J., McEnroe–Petitte, D. M., Fronda, D. C., & Obeidat, A. A. (2018) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.001 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Doolen, J., Mariani, B., Atz, T., Horsley, T. L., Rourke, J. O., McAfee, K., & Cross, C. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
- Villanova University (US)
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Loyola University Chicago (US)
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Nevada State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Doolen, Jessica
- Venue
- Clinical Simulation in Nursing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 290-302
- ISSN
- 1876-1399 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2344053967
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 13.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Simulation in Nursing (publishedVersion)
- Open PRAIRIE (South Dakota State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- high-fidelity simulation, undergraduate nursing education, simulation-based training, integrative review, research limitations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review