The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BirdNET: A deep learning solution for avian diversity monitoring
Open accessAbstract
Variation in avian diversity in space and time is commonly used as a metric to assess environmental changes. Conventionally, such data were collected by expert observers, but passively collected acoustic data is rapidly emerging as an alternative survey technique. However, efficiently extracting accurate species richness data from large audio datasets has proven challenging. Recent advances in deep artificial neural networks (DNNs) have transformed the field of machine learning, frequently outperforming traditional signal processing techniques in the domain of acoustic event detection and classification. We developed a DNN, called BirdNET, capable of identifying 984 North American and European bird species by sound. Our task-specific model architecture was derived from the family of residual networks (ResNets), consisted of 157 layers with more than 27 million parameters, and was trained using extensive data pre-processing, augmentation, and mixup. We tested the model against three independent datasets: (a) 22,960 single-species recordings; (b) 286 h of fully annotated soundscape data collected by an array of autonomous recording units in a design analogous to what researchers might use to measure avian diversity in a field setting; and (c) 33,670 h of soundscape data from a single high-quality omnidirectional microphone deployed near four eBird hotspots frequented by expert birders. We found that domain-specific data augmentation is key to build models that are robust against high ambient noise levels and can cope with overlapping vocalizations. Task-specific model designs and training regimes for audio event recognition perform on-par with very complex architectures used in other domains (e.g., object detection in images). We also found that high temporal resolution of input spectrograms (short FFT window length) improves the classification performance for bird sounds. In summary, BirdNET achieved a mean average precision of 0.791 for single-species recordings, a F0.5 score of 0.414 for annotated soundscapes, and an average correlation of 0.251 with hotspot observation across 121 species and 4 years of audio data. By enabling the efficient extraction of the vocalizations of many hundreds of bird species from potentially vast amounts of audio data, BirdNET and similar tools have the potential to add tremendous value to existing and future passively collected audio datasets and may transform the field of avian ecology and conservation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“More recently, artificial intelligence deep learning models, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), have been developed to identify birds, bats or amphibians36–40.”
From Soundscapes and deep learning enable tracking biodiversity recovery in tropical forests (2023) · cites this paper as [40]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Models pre-trained on ImageNet are configured to extract a variety of generic image features that can be useful for spectrogram recognition40.”
From Soundscapes and deep learning enable tracking biodiversity recovery in tropical forests (2023) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“While ML has been extensively applied to camera trap images, its application to long-term PAM datasets is still in its infancy and the first DL-based studies are only starting to appear”
From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [61]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., & Dollar, P. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.324 · Cited by 30,581
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate ShiftPreprint
Ioffe, S. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.57702/o9raffed · Cited by 15,273
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision
(1995) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.1995.466933 · Cited by 13,117
Zagoruyko, S., & Komodakis, N. (2016) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2016 · doi:10.5244/c.30.87 · Cited by 7,244
mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimization
Zhang, H., Cisse, M., Dauphin, Y. N., & Lopez-Paz, D. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.09412 · Cited by 5,831
SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognition
Park, D. S., Chan, W., Zhang, Y., Chiu, C.-C., Zoph, B., Cubuk, E. D., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · Interspeech 2019 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2019-2680 · Cited by 3,558
Audio Set: An ontology and human-labeled dataset for audio events
Gemmeke, J. F., Ellis, D. P. W., Freedman, D., Jansen, A., Lawrence, W., Moore, R. C., Plakal, M., & Ritter, M. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2017.7952261 · Cited by 3,134
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kiyokawa, 2019, Sound event detection with ResNet and self-mask module for DCASE 2019 task 4, Tech. Rep.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–905 of 905
Luna, P., Galindo, P., Parra-Puente, D., Guevara, J. E., Obando-Tello, B., Mitesser, O., Müller, J., Blüthgen, N., & Schaefer, H. M. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7674811
Weiss, L., Dörner, L., Kather, V. S., de Koning, M., Velde, K. T., Pauwels, I. S., Tudorache, C., & Slabbekoorn, H. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05843-0_177
Biodiversity and urban low-carbon development: an empirical study from Haidian District, Beijing
Dai, W., Zhang, Y., & Heath, T. (2026) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s11252-026-02165-3
Reproducing a year-round expert survey with deep learning
Winiarska, D., & Budka, M. (2026) · Bioacoustics · doi:10.1080/09524622.2026.2751188
Quirós-Corella, F., Barrantes-Madrigal, J., Jiménez, R., Esquivel, C., & Izaguirre, M. R. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-43217-9_22
Metadata
- Authors
- Kahl, S., Wood, C. M., Eibl, M., & Klinck, H.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Chemnitz University of Technology (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Kahl, Stefan
- Venue
- Ecological Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 61
- Pages
- 101236
- ISSN
- 1574-9541 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3121931845
- Cited by
- 903
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 242 · 2025: 250 · 2024: 197 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 19
- FWCI
- 47.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Ecological Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Arthur Vining Davis Foundations
- European Commission
- European Social Fund
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Keywords
- BirdNET, sound event detection, passive acoustic monitoring, autonomous recording units, soundscape analysis, ResNet, data augmentation, mixup, ambient noise robustness, bird conservation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review