Environmental criteria in the public purchases above the EU threshold values by three Nordic countries: 2003 and 2005
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Croatian results are similar to those of the 2009 study by Nissinen et al. of Finland, Sweden and Denmark.
“In comparison with a study conducted in Finland, Sweden and Denmark in 2009 by Nissinen et al. (2009) the results are similar.”
From Analysis of Croatian public procurement notes: Green public procurement as a strategic tool to encourage sustainable food production (2024) · cites this paper as Nissinen et al. (2009)
Agricultural and related products are assessed as product groups with medium apparent greenness in public purchasing.
“Agricultural and related products are assessed as product groups with medium apparent greenness in public purchasing”
From Analysis of Croatian public procurement notes: Green public procurement as a strategic tool to encourage sustainable food production (2024) · cites this paper as Nissinen et al. (2009)
In the 2005 Nordic study, the proportion of green calls for tenders was 52% for Finland, 86% for Sweden, 86% for Denmark, averaging 66%.
“proportion of green calls for tenders in 2005 was 52% for Finland, for Sweden 86%, for Denmark 86% or in average 66%.”
From Analysis of Croatian public procurement notes: Green public procurement as a strategic tool to encourage sustainable food production (2024) · cites this paper as Nissinen et al. (2009)
Cites
Fostering sustainability through sourcing from small businesses: public sector perspectives
Walker, H., & Preuss, L. (2008) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.014 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Circular supply chain management: a definition and structured literature review
Farooque, M., Zhang, A., Thürer, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.303 · Cited by 894 · see citing works
Motivating green public procurement in China: An individual level perspective
Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., & Sarkis, J. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.009 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Pacheco-Blanco, B., & Bastante-Ceca, M. J. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.056 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Getting the green light on green public procurement: Macro and meso determinants
Rosell, J. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123710 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Are EU Institutions Still Green Actors? An Empirical Study of Green Public Procurement
Badell, D., & Rosell, J. (2021) · JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/jcms.13204 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Perica, M. (2024) · Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development · doi:10.24294/jipd10881
“Other papers focused on outcome and analyzed and estimated how many green tenders were published (Adham et al., 2012; Faith-Ell et al., 2006; Kippo-Edlund et al., 2005; Nissinen et al., 2009).”
- Authors
- Nissinen, A., Parikka-Alhola, K., & Rita, H.
- Affiliations
- Finnish Environment Institute (FI)
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Nissinen, A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1838-1849
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030429299
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 9.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecological Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Academy of Finland
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Keywords
- green public procurement, environmental criteria, public procurement, sustainable consumption and production, Nordic countries, Denmark, Finland, Sweden
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
