Cited by 216Public Procurement and PolicySustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

Motivating green public procurement in China: An individual level perspective

Zhu, Qinghua, Geng, Yong, Sarkis, Joseph·2013·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

Green public procurement (GPP) practices have been recognized as an effective policy tool for sustainable production and consumption. However, GPP practices adoption, especially in developing countries, is still an issue. Seeking to help understand these adoption issues, we develop a conceptual model which hypothesizes moderation effects of GPP knowledge on the relationships between GPP drivers and practices. Using primary data collected from 193 Chinese government officials, we find that regulations, rewards & incentive gains, and stakeholders exert pressure to motivate adoption of GPP practices. Knowledge of GPP regulations, responsibilities and experiences in developed countries is found to be limited. The study also found that voluntary regulations may actually be demotivating GPP practices. This study contributes to further theoretical and practical understanding of GPP practices. The findings can be helpful for policy makers, especially those in developing countries, to establish promotion and diffusion mechanisms for GPP practices as an important sustainable development tool.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.009

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., & Sarkis, J.
Affiliations
  • Dalian University of Technology (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Clark University (US)
Corresponding author
Geng, Yong
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
126
Pages
85-95
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006811003
Cited by
209
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 2
FWCI
23.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (71025002)
  • National Key Basic Research Program of China (2011CB013406)
  • Natural Science Foundation of China (71033004, 712111042)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (2008-318)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology (2011BAJ06B01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
green public procurement, government officials, voluntary regulation, regulatory pressure, rewards and incentives, stakeholder pressure, sustainable consumption and production, China, developing countries
MeSH terms
China, Conservation of Natural Resources, Government, Individuality, Models, Psychological, Models, Theoretical, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review