Cited by 335Mining and Resource ManagementExtractivism and Socioeconomic IssuesAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Resistance to mining: a review

Conde, Marta·2017·Ecological Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.025

Cites

176 of 176 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some scholars argue that there is more at stake in mining conflicts than competition over resources, highlighting that Indigenous movements are motivated by broader issues of recognition and resistance to extractivism.

    “In contrast, some scholars have argued that there is more at stake in mining conflicts than competition over resources.These studies highlight that Indigenous movements are not only motivated by immediate concerns, but by broader issues of recognition and, in many cases, resistance to extractivism (Conde, 2017;Coombes et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 178 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conde, M.
Affiliations
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Conde, Marta
Venue
Ecological Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
132
Pages
80-90
ISSN
0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2546122269
Cited by
331
References
178
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1
FWCI
19.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecological Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Spanish Ministry (CSO2010 21979)
  • Sida (TKN150317115354)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
mining conflicts, environmental justice, indigenous rights, compensation, post-material values, legal challenges, corporate social responsibility, commodity chains, environmental impact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review