Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cooper (1988) stated that focus encompasses research outcomes, methods, theories, and practices.
“According to Cooper, the criterion called focus encompasses such factors as (1) research outcomes, (2) research methods, (3) theories, and (4) practices or applications.”
From Investigating Critical Thinking in ELT Textbooks: A Systematic Literature Review of Textbook Evaluation Studies (2024) · cites this paper as Cooper, 1988
Cites
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews
Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008 · Cited by 1,987 · see citing works
Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Using the Past and Present to Explore the Future
Torraco, R. J. (2016) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484316671606 · Cited by 1,345 · see citing works
Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/0047239516661713 · Cited by 967 · see citing works
The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda
Sutherland, W., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.004 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
A Framework for Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews
Templier, M., & Paré, G. (2015) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.03706 · Cited by 553 · see citing works
Resistance to mining: a review
Conde, M. (2017) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.025 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Shin, G., Jarrahi, M. H., Fei, Y., Karami, A., Gafinowitz, N., Byun, A., & Lu, X. (2019) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103153 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Maturity Assessment for Industry 5.0: A Review of Existing Maturity Models
Hein-Pensel, F., Winkler, H., Brückner, A., Wölke, M., Jabs, I., Mayan, I. J., Kirschenbaum, A., Friedrich, J., & Zinke-Wehlmann, C. (2023) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.12.009 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Cooper, H., & Koenka, A. C. (2012) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0027119 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Self-citationTemplier, M., & Paré, G. (2018) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2017.1398880 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Role of AI in Blended Learning: A Systematic Literature Review
Park, Y., & Doo, M. Y. (2024) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v25i1.7566 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Maturity Model of Digitization for SMEs
Blatz, F., Bulander, R., & Dietel, M. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) · doi:10.1109/ice.2018.8436251 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Adaptive Empathy Learning Support in Peer Review Scenarios
Wambsganss, T., Soellner, M., Koedinger, K. R., & Leimeister, J. M. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517740 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
How can nonprofit boards innovate for growth? An <scp>integrative‐systematic</scp> review
Richardson, S., Kelly, S. J., & Gillespie, N. (2023) · Nonprofit Management and Leadership · doi:10.1002/nml.21563 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Soe, T. (2024) · Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.31261/tapsla.13882 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Rethinking Alternative Education Accountability Indicators: A Multilevel and Contextual Perspective
Newton, X. A., Lohmeier, J. H., Thompson, S. R., Oh, B., Dmello, J. R., & Trainor, A. (2022) · Performance Improvement Quarterly · doi:10.1002/piq.21358 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cooper, H. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cooper, Harris M.
- Venue
- Knowledge in Society
- Published
- 1988-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 104-126
- ISSN
- 0897-1986 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085230034
- Cited by
- 1,014
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 107 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 1.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Knowledge, technology & policy/Knowledge in society/Knowledge, technology, & policy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Keywords
- knowledge synthesis, inter-rater reliability, educational research, psychology research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
