A framework for decoupling human need satisfaction from energy use
Open accessAbstract
Climate change poses great challenges to modern societies, central amongst which is to decouple human need satisfaction from energy use. Energy systems are the main source of greenhouse gas emissions, and the services provided by energy (such as heating, power, transport and lighting) are vital to support human development. To address this challenge, we advocate for a eudaimonic need-centred understanding of human well-being, as opposed to hedonic subjective views of well-being. We also argue for a shift in the way we analyse energy demand, from energy throughput to energy services. By adopting these perspectives on either end of the wellbeing-energy spectrum, a “double decoupling” potential can be uncovered. We present a novel analytic framework and showcase several methodological approaches for analysing the relationship between, and decoupling of, energy services and human needs. We conclude by proposing future directions of research in this area based on the analytic framework.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Access to energy is a condition for good health and social inclusion.
“access to energy is a condition for good health and social inclusion (e.g. Brand-Correa and Steinberger, 2017).”
From Sustainable welfare: How do universal basic income and universal basic services compare? (2021) · cites this paper as Brand-Correa and Steinberger, 2017
Cites
Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being.
Ryff, C. D. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069 · Cited by 14,847 · see citing works
On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141 · Cited by 11,567 · see citing works
Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1 · Cited by 2,187 · see citing works
Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia
Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4 · Cited by 1,752 · see citing works
International Energy Agency (2012) · World Energy Outlook · doi:10.1787/weo-2012-en · Cited by 1,219 · see citing works
The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition
(2010) · Transcending the Boundaries of Law · doi:10.4324/9780203848531-26 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Transcending the Boundaries of Law
(2010) · Routledge · doi:10.4324/9780203848531 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sustainable welfare: How do universal basic income and universal basic services compare?
Büchs, M. (2021) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107152 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Bridging the climate mitigation gap with economy‐wide material productivity
Scott, K., Giesekam, J., Barrett, J., & Owen, A. (2019) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12831 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brand-Correa, L. I., & Steinberger, J. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Brand-Correa, Lina I.
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 141
- Pages
- 43-52
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2616883054
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 9.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ecological Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Colciencias
- EPSRC (EP/J00555X/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
- Keywords
- eudaimonic well-being, hedonic well-being, energy services, energy demand analysis, greenhouse gas emissions, climate change mitigation, energy throughput, analytical framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review