Cited by 250Sustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisSustainable Development and Environmental PolicyEnergy, Environment, and Transportation Policies

A framework for decoupling human need satisfaction from energy use

Open access
Brand-Correa, Lina I., Steinberger, Julia K.·2017·Ecological Economics

Abstract

Climate change poses great challenges to modern societies, central amongst which is to decouple human need satisfaction from energy use. Energy systems are the main source of greenhouse gas emissions, and the services provided by energy (such as heating, power, transport and lighting) are vital to support human development. To address this challenge, we advocate for a eudaimonic need-centred understanding of human well-being, as opposed to hedonic subjective views of well-being. We also argue for a shift in the way we analyse energy demand, from energy throughput to energy services. By adopting these perspectives on either end of the wellbeing-energy spectrum, a “double decoupling” potential can be uncovered. We present a novel analytic framework and showcase several methodological approaches for analysing the relationship between, and decoupling of, energy services and human needs. We conclude by proposing future directions of research in this area based on the analytic framework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.019

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brand-Correa, L. I., & Steinberger, J. K.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Brand-Correa, Lina I.
Venue
Ecological Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
141
Pages
43-52
ISSN
0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2616883054
Cited by
250
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3
FWCI
9.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecological Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Colciencias
  • EPSRC (EP/J00555X/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Keywords
eudaimonic well-being, hedonic well-being, energy services, energy demand analysis, greenhouse gas emissions, climate change mitigation, energy throughput, analytical framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review