Cited by 429Political Philosophy and EthicsDiscrimination and Equality LawLegal Rights and Human Rights

The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition

Open access
MARTHA ALBERTSON FINEMAN·2010·Transcending the Boundaries of Law

Abstract

In this chapter I develop the concept of vulnerability in order to argue for a more responsive state and a more egalitarian society. I argue that vulnerability is universal and constant, inherent in the human condition. The vulnerability approach I propose is an alternative to traditional equal protection analysis; it moves us beyond identity-based inquiries because it focuses not only on discrimination against defined groups, but is concerned with the privileges conferred on limited segments of the population by the state through its institutions. Therefore, vulnerability analyses concentrate on our social structures and institutions established to manage our common vulnerabilities. This approach has the potential to move us beyond the confines of current discrimination-based models toward a more substantive vision of equality. Theorizing a concept of vulnerability necessitates developing a more complex subject around which to build social policy and law; this new subject is useful in redefining and expanding current ideas about state responsibility toward individuals and institutions. In fact, I argue that the “vulnerable subject” must replace the autonomous and independent subject asserted in the liberal tradition. Far more representative of actual lived experience and the human condition, the vulnerable subject should be at the center of our political and theoretical endeavors. The vision of the state that would emerge in such an engagement would be more responsive to and responsible for the vulnerable subject, a reimagining that is essential to attaining a more equal society than currently exists in America. Before developing the vulnerability thesis, I will address some conceptual impediments to the idea of a more responsive state. First, an impoverished sense of equality is embedded in our current legal doctrine. We understand equality in formal terms, focused on discrimination and inattentive to underlying societal inequities. Second, the view that the state’s proper role is one of restraint and abstention is politically powerful. Even self-identified progressive social reformers are suspicious of the state; the rhetoric of non-intervention prevails in policy discussions, deterring positive measures designed to address inequalities. We idealize contract and correspondingly reify individual choice in ways that mask society’s role in perpetuating inequality. The fact that societal institutions play a significant role in perpetrating inequality is the very reason that we need a more active and responsive state.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203848531-26

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 20 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    In 1999, the Supreme Court of Vermont held that same-sex couples were entitled to receive the legal benefits and protections that were previously only afforded to married couples of opposite sexes.

    “In 1999, the Supreme Court of Vermont looked into its own early American history and held that same-sex couples were entitled to receive the legal benefits and protections that were previously only afforded to married couples of opposite sexes.55”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [55]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Interpretationreasoning

    Privileges and disadvantages accumulate across systems and can combine to create effects more devastating or beneficial than the weight of each separate part.

    “Privileges and disadvantages accumulate across systems and can combine to create effects that are more devastating or more beneficial than the weight of each separate part.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning

    The limitedness of the current equality model has resulted in significant backlash.

    “Politically, this limitedness is problematic because it can and has resulted in significant backlash.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationnone given

    Contracts have no independent force; they are documents dependent on the institutions of the state to give them life through interpretation, implementation, and execution.

    “However, contracts have no independent force; they are merely documents dependent on the institutions of the state to give them life through interpretation, implementation and execution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Interpretationcitation

    With respect to assets any one person possesses, it is not multiple identities that intersect to produce compounded inequalities, but rather systems of power and privilege that interact to produce webs of advantages and disadvantages.

    “Therefore, with respect to the assets any one person possesses, it is not multiple identities that intersect to produce compounded inequalities, as has been posited by some theorists, but rather systems of power and privilege that interact to produce webs of advantages and disadvantages.43”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [43]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 54
  • May combine two claims. 25
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Vulnerability is typically associated with victimhood, deprivation, dependency, or pathology.

    “Vulnerability is typically associated with victimhood, deprivation, dependency, or pathology.20”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The vulnerability approach has the potential to move beyond discrimination-based models toward a more substantive vision of equality.

    “This approach has the potential to move us beyond the stifling confines of current discrimination-based models toward a more substantive vision of equality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Employment systems should be added as human asset-conferring institutions; like education and healthcare, they develop the human being, impart assets that allow market participation, and facilitate accumulation of material resources that bolster resilience.

    “In addition to the examples Kirby provides, employment systems should be added; like education and healthcare, they develop the human being, impart assets that allow participation in the market and, thus, facilitate the accumulation of material resources that help bolster individuals' resilience in the face of vulnerability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Physical assets determine present quality of life and provide the material basis for accumulation of additional resources.

    “These assets determine our present quality of life, and provide the material basis for accumulation of additional resources-or resources that are more sustainable-in the form of savings and investments.36”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Social assets are also accumulated through political collectives in which individuals bolster their resilience by joining together to address vulnerabilities generated by the market.

    “Kirby argues persuasively that social assets are also accumulated through political collectives in which individuals bolster their resilience by joining together to address vulnerabilities generated by the market.41”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Vulnerability initially should be understood as arising from our embodiment, which carries with it the ever-present possibility of harm, injury, and misfortune from mildly adverse to catastrophically devastating events, whether accidental, intentional, or otherwise.

    “Vulnerability initially should be understood as arising from our embodiment, which carries with it the ever-present possibility of harm, injury, and misfortune from mildly adverse to catastrophically devastating events, whether accidental, intentional, or otherwise.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Human beings need each other, and we must structure our institutions in response to this fundamental human reality.

    “Contemplating our shared vulnerability it becomes apparent that human beings need each other, and that we must structure our institutions in response to this fundamental human reality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    In American legal culture, the idea of the private acts as a principle of restraint and abstention.

    “In American legal culture, the idea of the private acts as a principle of restraint and abstention.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Nonintervention has facilitated a skewed and unequal society with the distance between rich and poor growing in recent years.

    “The fact that nonintervention has facilitated a skewed and unequal society with the distance between rich and poor growing in recent years, makes clear that some form of prevailing power is essential to counter unfettered self-interest.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Even self-identified progressive social reformers are suspicious of the state, and the rhetoric of non-intervention prevails in policy discussions, deterring positive measures designed to address inequalities.

    “Even self-identified progressive social reformers are suspicious of the state; the rhetoric of non-intervention prevails in policy discussions, deterring positive measures designed to address inequalities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Vulnerability is universal and, as such, transcends historic categories of impermissible discrimination.

    “Vulnerability is universal and, as such, transcends historic categories of impermissible discrimination.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The sub-prime mortgage crisis affected white and middle-class people as well as those in the traditional suspect categories.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The state itself is manifested through complex institutional arrangements.

    “A first step in this reconception is understanding that the state itself is manifested through complex institutional arrangements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Human vulnerability is universal but also particular: it is experienced uniquely by each of us and this experience is greatly influenced by the quality and quantity of resources we possess or can command.

    “Undeniably universal, human vulnerability is also particular: it is experienced uniquely by each of us and this experience is greatly influenced by the quality and quantity of resources we possess or can command.27”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Societal institutions themselves are not foolproof shelters, even in the short term.

    “Of course, societal institutions themselves are not foolproof shelters, even in the short term.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Under formal equality, unless some distortion is perceived to be introduced by impermissible bias, the state is not accountable.

    “Unless some distortion is perceived to be introduced by impermissible bias, the state is not accountable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Within systems for conferring assets, individuals are often positioned differently, some more privileged, others relatively disadvantaged.

    “Within the various systems for conferring assets, individuals are often positioned differently from one another, so that some are more privileged, while others are relatively disadvantaged.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given

    Attention to the situation of the vulnerable individual leads us to redirect focus onto the societal institutions that are created in response to individual vulnerability.

    “One promising theoretical potential of making vulnerability central in an analysis of equality is that attention to the situation of the vulnerable individual leads us to redirect focus onto the societal institutions that are created in response to individual vulnerability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Vulnerability is universal and constant, inherent in the human condition.

    “I argue that vulnerability is-and should be understood to be-universal and constant, inherent in the human condition.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The vulnerable subject is more representative of actual lived experience and the human condition than the liberal subject.

    “Far more representative of actual lived experience and the human condition, the vulnerable subject should be at the center of our political and theoretical endeavors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Individuals can attempt to lessen the risk or mitigate the impact of such events, but they cannot eliminate their possibility.

    “Individuals can attempt to lessen the risk or mitigate the impact of such events, but they cannot eliminate their possibility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Sometimes privileges conferred within certain systems can mediate or even cancel out disadvantages conferred in others.

    “Sometimes privileges conferred within certain systems can mediate or even cancel out disadvantages conferred in others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These collectives historically included trade unions and political parties, but today the welfare state and insurance are also offered as alternative, often competing, means of protection against risk.

    “These collectives historically included trade unions and political parties, but todayas Kirby recognizes-the welfare state and insurance are also offered as alternative, often competing, means of protection against risk.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Vulnerability is a more encompassing concept than dependency, and analyses centered around vulnerability are more politically potent than those based on dependency.

    “Vulnerability is a more encompassing concept and, for that reason, analyses centered around vulnerability are more politically potent than those based on dependency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The vulnerable subject approach embodies the fact that human reality encompasses a wide range of differing and interdependent abilities over the span of a lifetime.

    “The vulnerable subject approach does what the one-dimensional liberal subject approach cannot: it embodies the fact that human reality encompasses a wide range of differing and interdependent abilities over the span of a lifetime.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These individuals do not disprove the existence of structural inequalities or the need for remedial action.

    “These individuals do not disprove the existence of structural inequalities or the need for remedial action, however.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Current conceptions of privacy are based on the public/private dichotomy, which places some things and institutions presumptively beyond state regulation and control.

    “Current conceptions of privacy are based on this dichotomy, which places some things and institutions presumptively beyond state regulation and control.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    State restraint is often expressed in terms of the separate spheres ideology: there is a contrast between public and private domains, with the state cast as the quintessential public entity and the family cast as essentially private.

    “State restraint is often expressed in terms of the separate spheres ideology: there is a contrast between public and private domains, with the state cast as the quintessential public entity and the family cast as essentially private.9”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Social assets are networks of relationships from which we gain support and strength, including the family and other cultural groupings and associations.

    “Finally, social assets are networks of relationships from which we gain support and strength, including the family and other cultural groupings and associations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Sameness of treatment has been used to argue increasingly effectively against measures like affirmative action that might generate remedies for past inequities.

    “What is more, sameness of treatment has been used to argue increasingly effectively against measures like affirmative action that might generate remedies for past inequities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    These systems interact in ways that further affect inequalities.

    “Important to the consideration of privilege is the fact that these systems interact in ways that further affect these inequalities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The formal equality model fails to take into account existing inequality of circumstances and fails to disrupt persistent forms of inequality.

    “The formal equality model therefore not only fails to take into account existing inequality of circumstances, it also fails to disrupt persistent forms of inequality.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Vulnerability analysis questions the idea of a liberal subject, suggesting that the vulnerable subject is a more accurate and complete universal figure to place at the heart of social policy.

    “Vulnerability analysis questions the idea of a liberal subject, suggesting that the vulnerable subject is a more accurate and complete universal figure to place at the heart of social policy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Because neither inequalities nor the systems that produce them are inevitable, they can be objects of reform.

    “Because neither inequalities nor the systems that produce them are inevitable, they can also be objects of reform.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Asset-conferring institutions initially are brought into legal existence only through state mechanisms, placing them within the domain of state responsibility.

    “The nature of this relationship, coupled with the fact that asset conferring institutions initially are brought into legal existence only through state mechanisms, places such institutions within the domain of state responsibility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    We idealize contract and reify individual choice in ways that mask society's role in perpetuating inequality.

    “Further, we idealize contract and correspondingly reify individual choice in ways that mask society's role in perpetuating inequality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The view that the proper role of the state is one of restraint and abstention is politically powerful.

    “Second, the view that the proper role of the state is one of restraint and abstention is politically powerful.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The vulnerability approach recognizes that individuals are anchored at each end of their lives by dependency and the absence of capacity.

    “The vulnerability approach recognizes that individuals are anchored at each end of their lives by dependency and the absence of capacity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Identity categories are both over- and under-inclusive.

    “In this regard, identity categories are both overand under-inclusive.7”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites FINEMAN, THE ILLUSION OF EQUALITY, supra note 2

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Formal equality leaves undisturbed and may validate existing institutional arrangements that privilege some and disadvantage others.

    “Formal equality leaves undisturbed-and may even serve to validate--existing institutional arrangements that privilege some and disadvantage others.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Kirby identifies health and education as chief human assets, making institutions governing education and health care prime candidates for a vulnerability analysis.

    “Kirby identifies health and education as chief among assets in this category, making the institutions governing education and health 40 care prime candidates for a vulnerability analysis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Some form of prevailing power is essential to counter unfettered self-interest.

    “The fact that nonintervention has facilitated a skewed and unequal society with the distance between rich and poor growing in recent years, makes clear that some form of prevailing power is essential to counter unfettered self-interest.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The state, as the creator of legitimate social organizations susceptible to its ongoing coercive authority, should assume a corresponding responsibility to see that these organizations operate in an equitable manner.

    “The state, in exercising its unique role as the creator of legitimate social organizations susceptible to its ongoing coercive authority, should assume a corresponding responsibility to see that these organizations operate in an equitable manner.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The ultimate objective of a vulnerability analysis is to argue that the state must be more responsive to, and responsible for, vulnerability.

    “The institutions of particular interest are those that are created and maintained under the legitimating authority of the state, since the ultimate objective of a vulnerability analysis is to argue that the state must be more responsive to, and responsible for, vulnerability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    State-facilitated institutions that have grown up around vulnerability are interlocking and overlapping, creating layered opportunities and support but also gaps and potential pitfalls.

    “The state facilitated institutions that have grown up around vulnerability are interlocking and overlapping, creating the possibility of layered opportunities and support for individuals, but also containing gaps and potential pitfalls.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Cumulatively these assets provide individuals with resilience in the face of vulnerability.

    “Cumulatively these assets provide individuals with “resilience” in the face of vulnerability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Vulnerability analysis concentrates on the structures society has and will establish to manage common vulnerabilities.

    “As such, vulnerability analysis concentrates on the structures our society has and will establish to manage our common vulnerabilities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Tax and inheritance laws impact the distribution of physical assets and are part of this system, as are banking rules and regulations and credit policies.

    “Certainly tax and inheritance laws impact the distribution of physical assets and are part of this system, but so also are banking rules and regulations, and credit policies.37”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Intent is irrelevant; what matters is whether or not these institutions are structured so as to respond unequally to the reality of our shared vulnerability.

    “Intent is irrelevant, what matters is whether or not these institutions are structured so as to respond unequally to the reality of our shared vulnerability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The realization that disadvantage is produced independent of racial and gender biases in many-but not all-instances provides an important political tool.

    “The realization that disadvantage is produced independent of racial and gender biases in many-but of course not all-instances provides an important political tool.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    A vulnerability analysis greatly magnifies state responsibility for the institutions and structures the state constructs and utilizes.

    “A vulnerability analysis greatly magnifies state responsibility for the institutions and structures the state constructs and utilizes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The state has an affirmative obligation not to privilege any group of citizens over others and to actively structure conditions for equality.

    “This focus on the structuring of societal institutions reflects the fact that the state has an affirmative obligation not to privilege any group of citizens over others and to actively structure conditions for equality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The Vermont Constitution's Common Benefits Clause predated the Fourteenth Amendment and was not based on a concept of discrimination, nor was it focused only on protection for a specific category of persons.

    “The Vermont Constitution's Common Benefits Clause predated the Fourteenth Amendment and was not based on a concept of discrimination, 5 7 nor was it focused only on protection for a specific category of persons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Baker employs a creative and positive mode of inquiry in line with the vulnerability approach: it is concerned with whether the state, in fashioning its institutions, acts with equal regard for the shared vulnerability of all its legal subjects.

    “Baker employs a creative and positive mode of inquiry in line with the vulnerability approach: It is concerned with whether the state, in fashioning its institutions, acts with equal regard for the shared vulnerability of all its legal subjects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Our current system has been built upon myths of autonomy and independence and thus fails to reflect the vulnerable as well as dependent nature of the human condition.

    “Our current system has been built upon myths of autonomy and independence and thus fails to reflect the vulnerable as well as dependent nature of the human condition.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Institutions can be compromised by legacies of practices, patterns of behavior, and entrenched interests that were formed during periods of exclusion and discrimination, but are now invisible.

    “They can be compromised by legacies of practices, patterns of behavior, and entrenched interests that were formed during periods of exclusion and discrimination, but are now invisible in a haze of lost history.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Vulnerability analysis demands that the state give equal regard to the shared vulnerability of all individuals, transcending the old identity categories as a limitation on the recognition that the state has a vital role to play in protecting against discrimination.

    “Vulnerability analysis demands that the state give equal regard to the shared vulnerability of all individuals, transcending the old identity categories as a limitation on the recognition that the state has a vital role to play in protecting against discrimination.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Mobilizing around the concept of shared, inevitable vulnerability may allow us to more easily build coalitions among those who have not benefited as fully as others from current societal organization.

    “Mobilizing around the concept of shared, inevitable vulnerability may allow us to more easily build coalitions among those who have not benefited as fully as others from current societal organization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    State mechanisms that ensure a more equitable distribution of assets and privilege across society would contribute to a more robust democracy and greater public participation.

    “Certainly state mechanisms that ensure a more equitable distribution of assets and privilege across society would contribute to a more robust democracy and greater public participation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A vulnerability inquiry proposes a more thorough and penetrating equality analysis-one that considers structural and institutional arrangements in assessing the state's response to situations of vulnerability before indicting the individual.

    “A vulnerability inquiry proposes a more thorough and penetrating equality analysis--one that considers structural and institutional arrangements in assessing the state's response to situations of vulnerability before indicting the individual.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Welfare reform during the 1990s should have been understood as a direct attack on all caretakers in that it undermined the value of unpaid care work and demonized motherhood outside of the patriarchal paradigm.

    “Welfare reform during the 1990s should have been understood as a direct attack on all caretakers in that it undermined the value of unpaid care work and demonized motherhood outside of the patriarchal paradigm.45”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Institutions as well as individuals are vulnerable to both internal and external forces.

    “Remember that institutions as well as individuals are vulnerable to both internal and external forces.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The state is required to ensure that institutions and structures within its control do not inappropriately benefit or disadvantage certain members of society.

    “Rather the state is required to ensure that institutions and structures within its control do not inappropriately benefit or disadvantage certain members of society.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
62 of 62
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The state is an appropriate actor to ensure equality.

    “The state, in exercising its unique role as the creator of legitimate social organizations susceptible to its ongoing coercive authority, should assume a corresponding responsibility to see that these organizations operate in an equitable manner.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The sub-prime mortgage crisis affected white and middle-class people as well as those in the traditional suspect categories.

    “The sub-prime mortgage crisis affected white and middle-class people as well as those in the traditional suspect categories.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Institutions are simultaneously constituted by and producers of vulnerability.

    “Because institutions are simultaneously constituted by and producers of vulnerability, we must continually challenge these institutional practices and the meting of social resources.”
3 of 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FINEMAN, M. A.
Corresponding author
MARTHA ALBERTSON FINEMAN
Venue
Transcending the Boundaries of Law
Published
2010-07-12
Pages
177-191
OpenAlex
W3121891619
Cited by
429
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 23
FWCI
216.52
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
Keywords
vulnerability, vulnerable subjects, equality, equal protection, substantive equality, state responsibility, liberalism, individualism, institutional inequality, social policy, non-interventionism, contract theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review