Cited by 2,187Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAging and Gerontology ResearchPhilosophical Ethics and Theory

Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction

Deci, Edward L., Ryan, Richard M.·2008·Journal of Happiness Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Deci, Edward L.
Venue
Journal of Happiness Studies
Published
2006-11-18
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
1-11
ISSN
  • 1389-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7780
OpenAlex
W2082204671
Cited by
2,187
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 132 · 2025: 186 · 2024: 202 · 2023: 199 · 2022: 213 · 2021: 192 · 2020: 177 · 2019: 169 · 2018: 109 · 2017: 111 · 2016: 98 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 56
FWCI
10.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Happiness Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Keywords
eudaimonia, hedonia, well-being, happiness, positive affect, negative affect, meaning in life, life satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review