The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures
Saaty, T. L. (1977) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5 · Cited by 10,360
Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems
Pharo, E., & Daily, G. C. (1998) · The Bryologist · doi:10.2307/3244191 · Cited by 5,261
de Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010) · Ecological Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 · Cited by 3,464
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach
Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2001) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 2,724
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis
Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4 · Cited by 2,659
Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D., Chan, K. M., Daily, G. C., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., et al. (2009) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/080023 · Cited by 2,389
The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being
Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2010) · Ecosystem Ecology · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750458.007 · Cited by 1,514
Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services
Hein, L., van Koppen, K., de Groot, R. S., & van Ierland, E. C. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005 · Cited by 1,291
Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions
Wallace, K. J. (2007) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.015 · Cited by 1,094
Cited by
Phan, T. N., Kuch, V., & Lehnert, L. W. (2020) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs12152411 · Cited by 616
Peng, J., Liu, Y., Wu, J., Lv, H., & Hu, X. (2015) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.007 · Cited by 441
Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services
Sara, M. D. R., Zulian, G., Joachim, M., & Thijssen, M. (2015) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · doi:10.2788/638737 · Cited by 294
Langemeyer, J., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Haase, D., Scheuer, S., & Elmqvist, T. (2016) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.013 · Cited by 283
A tiered approach for mapping ecosystem services
Grêt-Regamey, A., Weibel, B., Kienast, F., Rabe, S.-E., & Zulian, G. (2015) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.008 · Cited by 150
“ES maps can be integrated in participative planning methods where they are used as decision support (e.g. Koschke et al., 2012; Grêt-Regamey et al., 2013c).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Koschke, L., Fürst, C., Frank, S., & Makeschin, F.
- Venue
- Ecological Indicators
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 21
- Pages
- 54-66
- ISSN
- 1470-160X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017142214
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 26.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010
- The paper
- Koschke, L., Fürst, C., Frank, S., & Makeschin, F. (2012). A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecological Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
