Cited by 569Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesEconomic and Environmental ValuationSustainable Development and Environmental Policy

Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment

Open access
Martín-López, Berta, Gómez-Baggethun, Erik, García-Llorente, Marina, Montes, Carlos·2014·Ecological Indicators

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., García-Llorente, M., & Montes, C.
Affiliations
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Venue
Ecological Indicators
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
37
Pages
220-228
ISSN
1470-160X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017114528
Cited by
569
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 7
FWCI
28.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Ecological Indicators (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Keywords
ecosystem services assessment, value pluralism, ecosystem service trade-offs, value domains, socio-cultural values, monetary valuation, valuation methods, decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review