Cited by 98Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesArctic and Russian Policy StudiesIndigenous Studies and Ecology

Ecosystem services in the Arctic: a thematic review

Open access
Malinauskaite, Laura, Cook, David, Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur, Ögmundardóttir, Helga, Roman, Joe·2019·Ecosystem Services

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100898

Cites

83 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Granek, E. F., Polasky, S., Kappel, C. V., Reed, D. J., Stoms, D. M., Koch, E. W., . . . Aswani, S. (2010). Ecosystem Services as a Common Language for Coastal Ecosystem-Based Management. Conservation Biology, 24(1), 207-216. doi:10.1111/j.1523- 1739.2009.01355.x · DOI
  2. Hasselström, L., Cole, S., Håkansson, C., Khaleeva, Y., Noring, M., & Soutukorva, Å. (2012). The value of ecosystem services at risk from oil spills in the Barents Sea. Paper presented at the The ISEE conference, Rio de Janeiro.
  3. Huntington, H. P. (2013). Provisioning and cultural services. Chapter 18 of the Arctic Biodiversity Assessment (ABA). Status and trends in Arctic biodiversity. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF), Akureyri, Iceland, 593-626.
  4. Malkamäki, A., D'Amato, D., Hogarth, N., Kanninen, M., Pirard, R., Toppinen, A., & Zhou, W. (2017). The socioeconomic impacts of large-scale tree plantations on local communities: A systematic review protocol (Vol. 222): CIFOR.
  5. PAME -The Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment Working Group. (2013). The Arctic Ocean Review Project, Final Report.
  6. Young, O. R. (2010). Arctic governance-pathways to the future. Arctic Review, 1(2).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malinauskaite, L., Cook, D., Davíðsdóttir, B., Ögmundardóttir, H., & Roman, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Iceland (IS)
  • University of Vermont (US)
Venue
Ecosystem Services
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
36
Pages
100898
ISSN
2212-0416 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2917975921
Cited by
93
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecosystem Services (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (acceptedVersion)
  • Opin vísindi (Opin vísindi) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
Keywords
social-ecological systems, ecosystem services valuation, ecosystem services governance, knowledge gaps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review